Wikipedia Cofounder Warns Online Encyclopedia is Overloaded with Liberal Sources

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy.  “In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources – and sources friendly to globalist progressivism – are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.”  It […]

  • by:
  • 03/02/2023

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy.  “In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources – and sources friendly to globalist progressivism – are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.”  It […]

ad-image

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy. 

“In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources - and sources friendly to globalist progressivism - are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.” 

It is no secret that much of Big Tech and the world-wide-web has a bias against conservatives, so this doesn’t come as much of a surprise. 

“It is not too far to say that Wikipedia, like many other deeply biased institutions of our brave new digital world, has made itself into a kind of thought police that has de facto shackled conservative viewpoints with which they disagree,” he added. “Democracy cannot thrive under such conditions: I maintain that Wikipedia has become an opponent of vigorous democracy.” 

Sanger cited examples like the entries for Black Lives Matter, the 2020 election and Trump’s two impeachment, according to Just the News. He also indicated that conservative sites like Fox News, the New York Post and The Federalist are banned as official sources. 

“Those might be contrarian or conservative, but they are hardly ‘radical’; they are still mainstream,” he wrote. “So, how on earth can such viewpoints ever be given an airing on Wikipedia? Answer: often, they cannot, not if there are no ‘reliable sources’ available to report about them.” 

Image: by is licensed under

Opinion

View All

Birthplace of Jesus to undergo first major restoration in 600 years

Last month, Bethlehem lit its Christmas tree for the first time since the conflict in Gaza began....

KENNY CODY: Why I am running to represent Tennessee's 11th District in the State House

I am the Tennessee First, Trump-supporting, Christian conservative in this race running to represent ...

EVITA DUFFY to JACK POSOBIEC: Minneapolis Antifa is undermining the will of voters on immigration

"There are millions of Americans across the country who voted for President Trump ... and are being d...

Spain's socialist government to legalize 500,000 illegal immigrants

The measure was confirmed Tuesday by the socialist-led government of Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and...