Wikipedia Cofounder Warns Online Encyclopedia is Overloaded with Liberal Sources

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy.  “In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources – and sources friendly to globalist progressivism – are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.”  It […]

  • by:
  • 03/02/2023

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy.  “In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources – and sources friendly to globalist progressivism – are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.”  It […]

ad-image

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy. 

“In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources - and sources friendly to globalist progressivism - are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.” 

It is no secret that much of Big Tech and the world-wide-web has a bias against conservatives, so this doesn’t come as much of a surprise. 

“It is not too far to say that Wikipedia, like many other deeply biased institutions of our brave new digital world, has made itself into a kind of thought police that has de facto shackled conservative viewpoints with which they disagree,” he added. “Democracy cannot thrive under such conditions: I maintain that Wikipedia has become an opponent of vigorous democracy.” 

Sanger cited examples like the entries for Black Lives Matter, the 2020 election and Trump’s two impeachment, according to Just the News. He also indicated that conservative sites like Fox News, the New York Post and The Federalist are banned as official sources. 

“Those might be contrarian or conservative, but they are hardly ‘radical’; they are still mainstream,” he wrote. “So, how on earth can such viewpoints ever be given an airing on Wikipedia? Answer: often, they cannot, not if there are no ‘reliable sources’ available to report about them.” 

Image: by is licensed under

Opinion

View All

Human Events and The Post Millennial join JTN Network, parent company for Just the News

The Post Millennial and Human Events teams will continue to produce daily opinion, analysis and exclu...

JACK POSOBIEC and DAN CALDWELL: Honor the Marines on their 250th, but don't use them as the world's policemen

"We need a well-trained Marine Corps, well-trained Navy, Air Force, Army, but we should absolutely us...

Germany moves to begin deporting Syrian migrants, asylum-seekers now that civil war is over

"There are now absolutely no grounds for asylum in Germany, and therefore we can begin deportations."...

KENNY CODY: Republicans need to know who their enemy is—and it isn't Tucker Carlson

Conservatives need to know who their enemies are and what issues actually deserve the vitriol....