Wikipedia Cofounder Warns Online Encyclopedia is Overloaded with Liberal Sources

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy.  “In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources – and sources friendly to globalist progressivism – are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.”  It […]

  • by:
  • 03/02/2023

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy.  “In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources – and sources friendly to globalist progressivism – are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.”  It […]

ad-image

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy. 

“In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources - and sources friendly to globalist progressivism - are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.” 

It is no secret that much of Big Tech and the world-wide-web has a bias against conservatives, so this doesn’t come as much of a surprise. 

“It is not too far to say that Wikipedia, like many other deeply biased institutions of our brave new digital world, has made itself into a kind of thought police that has de facto shackled conservative viewpoints with which they disagree,” he added. “Democracy cannot thrive under such conditions: I maintain that Wikipedia has become an opponent of vigorous democracy.” 

Sanger cited examples like the entries for Black Lives Matter, the 2020 election and Trump’s two impeachment, according to Just the News. He also indicated that conservative sites like Fox News, the New York Post and The Federalist are banned as official sources. 

“Those might be contrarian or conservative, but they are hardly ‘radical’; they are still mainstream,” he wrote. “So, how on earth can such viewpoints ever be given an airing on Wikipedia? Answer: often, they cannot, not if there are no ‘reliable sources’ available to report about them.” 

Image: by is licensed under

Opinion

View All

Senior Russian general killed in Moscow car bombing as investigators look into possible Ukrainian link

Authorities said several possibilities are being examined, including the involvement of Ukrainian spe...

Denmark 'deeply upset' after Trump-appointed special envoy Jeff Landry vows to 'make Greenland a part of the US'

"It’s an honor to serve you in this volunteer position to make Greenland a part of the US," Landry sa...

'You have blood on your hands': Australian PM heckled, booed while attending memorial for Bondi Beach terror attack victims

The incident occurred at the "Light over Darkness" vigil in Bondi, held to commemorate those killed i...

LIBBY EMMONS: Turning Point's pundit wars and the battle for America's youth

What the pundits don't understand is that we don't care about their feuds, not really. We have our ow...