Wikipedia Cofounder Warns Online Encyclopedia is Overloaded with Liberal Sources

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy.  “In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources – and sources friendly to globalist progressivism – are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.”  It […]

  • by:
  • 03/02/2023

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy.  “In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources – and sources friendly to globalist progressivism – are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.”  It […]

ad-image

Co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger has a message for the site’s users: beware, it’s overloaded with liberal propaganda and counteracts democracy. 

“In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources - and sources friendly to globalist progressivism - are permitted,” Sanger wrote in an article titled “Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever.” 

It is no secret that much of Big Tech and the world-wide-web has a bias against conservatives, so this doesn’t come as much of a surprise. 

“It is not too far to say that Wikipedia, like many other deeply biased institutions of our brave new digital world, has made itself into a kind of thought police that has de facto shackled conservative viewpoints with which they disagree,” he added. “Democracy cannot thrive under such conditions: I maintain that Wikipedia has become an opponent of vigorous democracy.” 

Sanger cited examples like the entries for Black Lives Matter, the 2020 election and Trump’s two impeachment, according to Just the News. He also indicated that conservative sites like Fox News, the New York Post and The Federalist are banned as official sources. 

“Those might be contrarian or conservative, but they are hardly ‘radical’; they are still mainstream,” he wrote. “So, how on earth can such viewpoints ever be given an airing on Wikipedia? Answer: often, they cannot, not if there are no ‘reliable sources’ available to report about them.” 

Image: by is licensed under

Opinion

View All

JACK POSOBIEC at AMFEST 2025: Keep God at the center of everything you do

"I said it a year ago today, the only way the West will be saved is if we return our civilization bac...

EU spends $3M to end violence against women in Mexico

Since 2004, the European Union has financed 70 Mexican civil society organizations, investing a total...

H-1B visa workers held up in India as State Dept ramps up social media vetting

Renewal appointments were cancelled between the dates of Dec. 15 and 26....

Thoughtcrime LIVE at Amfest: The Erika Kirk effect is real

"Young men, if you want to find an Erika, then you got to be a Charlie. And to young women, if you wa...