I Guess Hillary’s Double Chin Won’t Matter

When it comes to looks, voters are harsher on men than women on their ballots. Economics professor Daniel S. Hamermesh at the University of Texas at Austin found by observing 312 candidates for key positions at the American Economic Association that male candidates rated as “good looking” stood a 56 better chance of being elected, […]

  • by:
  • 03/02/2023
ad-image

When it comes to looks, voters are harsher on men than women on their ballots. Economics professor Daniel S. Hamermesh at the University of Texas at Austin found by observing 312 candidates for key positions at the American Economic Association that male candidates rated as “good looking” stood a 56 better chance of being elected, but attractiveness had no measurable effect on female candidates. As reported by Congressional Weekly Hamermesh concluded, “A woman’s looks relative to those of other candidates in an election have absolutely no effect on her electoral chances. Among men, however, the impact is substantial and approaches statistical significance.”

 

Image:

Opinion

View All

HUMAN EVENTS DAILY: 'No Kings' isn’t harmless—it’s rooted in anti-Christian revolution and bloodshed

"...It starts with no Kings, then it goes to no Lords. Then all of a sudden you hear no priests, then...

Trump lets Russian oil tanker head to Cuba on refueling mission

“If a country wants to send some oil into Cuba right now, I have no problem whether it’s Russia or no...

Germany drafting plan to send 80% of Syrian migrants back home, remove residential rights

The push comes more than a year after the Syrian civil war officially ended....

ROD THOMSON: New Census data reveals how much Dems depend on illegal aliens for political power and government cash

This demonstrates how the big Democrat jurisdictions in our nation have been heavily reliant on the m...