Thanks for making mention of the Davis article, Matt. I was outraged this morning when I read it-not as much about what Davis was saying about Roe, but the fact that the Post's Dan Balz didn't bother to write that Davis is a pro-choice Republican.
If readers had been provided that information, they'd probably be wondering why the article was relevant (and deserved placement in the "A" section as opposed to "Metro").
Think about it: A pro-choice Republican is saying that if SCOTUS overturns Roe, it would come back to harm Republicans. What else would you expect from a pro-choice Republican? This isn't "A" section news, folks.
