Fourteen Attorneys General Sue Biden Admin. Over Changing Asylum Policy

A group of fourteen attorneys general – led by Arizona, Louisiana and Missouri – filed a lawsuit Thursday against the Biden administration for changing immigration policies established by Congress related to the asylum process.  Attorneys general from Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma and South Carolina joined the lawsuit.  The attorneys […]

  • by:
  • 03/02/2023

A group of fourteen attorneys general – led by Arizona, Louisiana and Missouri – filed a lawsuit Thursday against the Biden administration for changing immigration policies established by Congress related to the asylum process.  Attorneys general from Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma and South Carolina joined the lawsuit.  The attorneys […]

ad-image

A group of fourteen attorneys general - led by Arizona, Louisiana and Missouri - filed a lawsuit Thursday against the Biden administration for changing immigration policies established by Congress related to the asylum process. 

Attorneys general from Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma and South Carolina joined the lawsuit. 

The attorneys general are asking the court to halt an administrative rule change that will transform the asylum and parole process, facilitating the release of more illegal immigrants. 

The rule change "largely removes federal immigration judges from the asylum review process and instead gives asylum officers within the Department of Homeland Security unprecedented authority to grant asylum to migrants outright," Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said. "The new rule not only violates federal laws and bypasses Congress but also drastically erodes asylum integrity safeguards."

The lawsuit names Attorney General Merrick Garland, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review David Neil, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Troy Miller, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Tae Johnson, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Ur Jaddou, Chief of U.S. Border Patrol Raul Ortiz and their respective agencies as defendants.

The attorneys general argue the changes violate the Immigration and Nationality Act, Homeland Security Act, Secure Fence Act of 2006 and the Administrative Procedure Act, Just the News reports

If the administration's repeal of Title 42 enforcement isn’t halted by the courts, the new asylum changes would go into effect eight days later, the attorneys general point out, causing “a massive increase in illegal immigration and non-meritorious asylum claims.” The timing would cause “an exponential increase in illegal border crossings,” they argue, which will “stack a crisis upon a crisis."

Image: by is licensed under

Opinion

View All

China mobilizes massive floating sea barrier with thousands of fishing boats

Roughly 1,400 Chinese fishing vessels halted normal operations, returned to home ports, and then depl...

UK nurses win suit, won't be forced to change with men in locker rooms

“This is a victory for common sense and for every woman who simply wants to feel safe at work."...

Iraqi migrant who murdered 16-year-old Ukrainian girl by shoving her in front of train avoids prison in Germany

The man, identified as Mohammed A, should have been deported, but the deportation order against him w...