U.N. Needs to Examine Conscience

The United Nation’s member states talk a good talk when the cameras are rolling and they’re talking to a bunch of sycophantic New York Times reporters. Secretary-General Kofi Annan recently called for a new Human Rights Commission to enforce international conventions against rogue and U.N. member states’ egregious and multiple violations of human rights. Armed […]

  • by:
  • 03/02/2023
ad-image

The United Nation's member states talk a good talk when the cameras are rolling and they're talking to a bunch of sycophantic New York Times reporters. Secretary-General Kofi Annan recently called for a new Human Rights Commission to enforce international conventions against rogue and U.N. member states' egregious and multiple violations of human rights.

Armed with a renewed sense of righteousness and responsibility, the U.N. set about acting on Secretary Annan's proposal for a new commission. The commission would bar member states with a record of human rights abuses from having positions on the new human rights council. For once, it appeared that the U.N. was finally acting as the international enforcement agency it was founded as, rather than the dirty little secret that we kept in the closet.

Of course, like any deliberative body, the commission in its final proposed form was changed. The proposal now provides no guarantee that nations with a record of abuse will be prohibited from sitting on the commission. I guess a nation whose law provides for criminal punishment of pro-democracy journalists and coerced abortions is an upstanding advocate for human rights.

The proposal's current form has sparked opposition from the United States, who in good conscience could never support a commission comprised of nations with no regard whatsoever for basic human rights such as free religious expression. However, the proposal is not surprising coming from an organization opposed to the toppling of Saddam Hussein, not because they knew he didn't have weapons, but because members of the Security Council had lucrative business ties to Saddam and Iraqi oil. Adulterers don't support the pro-life movement, so I guess its déjà vu.

Instead of lambasting the United States and U.N. Ambassador John Bolton for their perceived opposition (support) to human rights, U.N. member states should do an examination of their own conscience, and recognize that in order to be regarded as a force for good in the world, they can't be participants in their self-created Mafia.

Image:

Opinion

View All

Polish border guard acquitted after firing at a group of migrants, judge ruled he was fulfilling his duty to Poland

"The law cannot yield to lawlessness…The soldier was sent to the border to protect its inviolability,...

BREAKING: Body cam footage released from Southampton police arresting Henry Nowak after he was brutally stabbed by Vickrum Digwa

Body camera footage released by police shows the final moments of Henry Nowak before he lost consciou...

JACK POSOBIEC: Tyler Robinson's attorneys want a 'conspiracy of censorship' as judge allows cameras in preliminary hearing

"They don't want you to see anything. They want you in the dark. They want a conspiracy of silence, a...

Father of murdered UK student Henry Nowak speaks out as killer Vickrum Digwa sentenced to life in prison

“I couldn’t help Henry in his final moments and there is nothing I can do to bring him back."...