Judge Puts Whales Above the Safety of Naval Officers

A federal judge ruled in favor of whales and against the Navy's use of a high-intesity sonar and, thereby, the Navy's safety.

  • by:
  • 03/02/2023
ad-image

On August 26 a federal judge barred the U.S. Navy from deploying high-intensity sonar (otherwise known as LFA) to detect quiet diesel submarines used by North Korea, China and Iran. In her 73-page opinion, Judge Elizabeth Laporte, rather disturbingly, ruled that the Navy, together with the "conservation groups" (read: environmental extremists) who sued the Navy, must negotiate as to where and when the sonar can be used.

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) happily celebrated the decision, describing it as (via a banner headline on its website) a "Big Win for Whales!" "Today's ruling is a reprieve not just for whales, porpoises, and fish, but ultimately for all of us who depend for our survival on healthy oceans," said Joel Reynolds, senior attorney at NRDC, which acted as lead plaintiff and counsel in the case.

FACT: NRDC apparently cares more about whales than Navy officers and enlisted personnel on submarines. Notwithstanding the fact that LFA has not inflicted any harm on marine mammals-Dr. Darlene Ketten, senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and a leading expert in sensory adaptation of marine mammals, said in her April 2003 testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee: "To date, there is no evidence of physical harm [to marine mammals] from LFA"-the decision undermines the safety and security of U.S. sailors. An exchange between Sen. Inhofe and Adm. William Fallon during a March 13 Senate Armed Services Committee hearing illustrates what's at stake:

SEN. INHOFE: But there are some circumstances under which this sonar is the only way of detecting [quite diesel submarines].

ADM. FALLON: Yes. We - the likelihood of detecting submarines without this in many circumstances we think is pretty low.

SEN. INHOFE: In an actual situation, not training, then if you had to shut down, what's the exposure?

ADM. FALLON: Well, we're not going to be able to get it online and we'll be forced to use what we have, which we don't think is adequate to meet this emerging threat.

SEN. INHOFE: So this is a life and death situation, it could be for your sailors?

ADM. FALLON: Well, if we end up in a position where we are asked to execute a mission with that kind of a threat and we can't detect that threat, then our forces are at risk.

Image:

Opinion

View All

US seizes $1 BILLION in Iranian cryptocurrency assets: Scott Bessent

"We have seized about a billion dollars of their crypto," Bessent said. "Just outright grabbed the wa...

UK substitute teacher ADMITS to taking over 100 upskirt photos of students

Abusali Rahman, a 36-year-old British national of Bangladeshi ethnicity, will face sentencing in Sept...

JACK POSOBIEC: Are the US and China working together to take out Iran's nuclear dust?

"They were discussing this and talking about even the nitty-gritty of could this be a joint operation...

JULIO RIVERA: America has to be prepared for an AI Y2K

Q-Day isn't some giant red button that suddenly gets pressed one morning. It's a slow-moving collisio...