Does Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris want to build another Berlin Wall on the southern border of a Soviet Amerika? Does she want to build the wall to keep illegals out or keep Americans in? The thought occurred to me as Harris announced Tuesday that she was no longer opposed to former President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful wall” and she would finish it if elected in November.
Along with her foot-in-mouth running mate Gov. Tim Walz – a commie-loving Maoist – Harris has put together the worst Marxist clown show presidential tickets in American history.
Yes, I know, conservatives have been calling Democratic presidential candidates far-left subversives for decades. Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) seemed downright dangerous when he was the nominee in 2008, a product of leftist social activism. Remember Sen. George McGovern (D-SD) in 1972? His campaign was characterized as being about “acid, amnesty and abortion.” He was seen as so far left that President Richard Nixon waltzed to victory in the greatest electoral college landslide in history. McGovern was a highly likable guy, in the same way as Vice President Hubert Humphrey was, but Americans just weren’t ready for McGovern’s radical politics that appealed to the hippies and the Youth in Power (YIppies) movement, led by the likes of Abbie Hoffman and Tom Hayden.
Are they ready for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz? Harris always defined herself – when she even thought about defining herself – as being on the left-wing of the Democratic Party. She drifted further to the left during her disastrous run for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020 when she embraced the defund the police craziness and raised money to bail out rioters and looters.
Since she stole the Democratic nomination this time around – or had others steal it for her and just give it to her – her usual word salad speeches have been reinforced with policy salads that are a mix of Marxism and expediency. But when she borrowed her housing policy from Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, you know what kind of vision she has for America. A locked down populace living in Soviet-style block housing, unable to find food at the local grocery store because the shelves are bare as a result of her price control policies that have starved the financial incentives that run a capitalist economy.
And look at this stumbling, bumbling running mate, Walz, who looks like a character from one of those Chevy Chase National Lampoon vacation movies. When he’s not claiming to be a war hero who never saw a minute of combat, his past speaks for itself. Here was a guy who praised China’s version of communism because it is a system “where everyone shares and everyone is the same.” Sounds like Kamala’s housing policy or for that matter it is another way of saying what Harris says is her objective for America: “equality of outcomes.”
Walz visited China on at least 30 occasions. He brought school children over with him. He taught there as a teacher. He couldn’t say enough about how the Chinese treated him and how he had access to all that free food – obviously a definite plus for Walz. Yet here was a guy who came from the freest, most productive, most affluent country in the world Where the average convenience store had more consumer options than the largest grocery store in China at that time and he chose communism.
And what a history of communism. Walz admired one of the worst mass murderers of the twentieth century in Mao Zedong, a madman who thought nothing of watching tens of millions of his citizens die in artificial famines, purges and reeducation camps through the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. China tried wage and price controls and there was perfect equality in starvation.
It might not be fashionable to wave around Mao’s little red book anymore – not even in China – but Walz has adopted the more current left-wing fads such as establishing a snitch line during Covid or providing free health care, and education for illegals while offering them a driver’s license so they can get to the clinic or college. Walz was so enamored of the rioting and looting in his home state after the death of George Floyd that he wanted to just watch the carnage as Minneapolis blew up amidst all that “mostly peaceful protest.” Walz must have taken a knee so many times for Black Lives Matter that he wore holes in the pants. He has become the embodiment of an aging lefty politician who yearns to appear youthful and relevant again even though that is an impossible fit no matter what ideological outfit he wears.
So what was in Kamala’s limited mind when she chose, or more likely, she was told to choose Walz as her running mate? Obviously it wasn’t an attempt to reassure conservative Democrats or bring so-called moderate Republicans into the fold.
Was the plan for Harris to shift to the center during the campaign leaving Walz at the far end of the spectrum?
Because Harris seems suddenly desperate to quell any suspicions that she wants to transform your country into Soviet Amerika. It’s not just her epiphany about the wall either; on Tuesday her campaign announced that Harris was no longer for electric vehicle mandates either.
Now just a minute wasn’t that what the Biden-Harris administration was all about? Forcing you to drive electric vehicles that no one wants to buy and that the automobile industry doesn’t even want to produce. Wasn’t it about fueling inflation with ridiculously named bills like the Inflation Reduction Act – that exercise in Orwellian newspeak that was purposed to do exactly the opposite of what it was called? Wasn't it about spending more trillions on phony Covid relief bills and infrastructure legislation that didn’t build infrastructure but Democratic fiefdoms?
And wasn’t it about open borders? Harris was the border czar that, in her case, meant not stopping people from illegally entering the United States but ensuring that tens of millions of them could walk across the border unmolested so they could be flown to their city of choice and go molest real Americans. If that was the job description of a border czar under the effete and doddering Joe Biden then she fulfilled it with outstanding success.
Open borders might be the defining policy of the Biden-Harris years because America has yet to reap its full, catastrophic results.
So why is Harris suddenly hip to the wall, something she once described as a “medieval vanity project?”
If you know anything about Democrats these days, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – a Democrat who has seen the awful truth about a party he served his whole life – knows so well, they are not about doing good for America. They want to keep you locked down and censored; they love to see you struggle so you can beg from the state.
When the Soviet Union ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961 it made the ludicrous claim that this man-made impediment to personal freedom was being erected to keep Western spies from entering East Germany, where they could contaminate and threaten the intricate workings of the communist system there and through the Soviet East Bloc. Of course, nobody in the West but commie sympathizers believed this narrative. Everyone else could see the obvious: this was a wall to keep East Germans from flowing into West Berlin and to freedom. Communists don’t want you to have freedom.
And neither do Democrats.
Do you believe for a moment that Harris or Walz – given their records on serving the whims of illegals – really want to stop mass illegal migration at the southern border? Do you think they really want a border or is this really about keeping Americans in? Is Trump’s “big, beautiful wall” a symbol of tyranny in Harris’ hands? Is it a warning that her regime will not get tough with illegals but with citizens not grateful to be living in a locked down country requiring constant emergency measures and chronic state intervention in their lives?
With Harris the wall will just be big, and a symbol of the totalitarian control that her government would wield over the lives of impoverished, embattled and enslaved Americans.
