Workers Group Asks Supreme Court to Get Their Money Back from Former Unions

A group of public-sector workers asked the Supreme Court to get their money back from former unions, which if successful could help thousands get refunds of their compulsory paycheck deductions. Two workers from California and two from Oregon, represented by the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and the Freedom Foundation, asked the Supreme […]

  • by:
  • 03/02/2023
ad-image

A group of public-sector workers asked the Supreme Court to get their money back from former unions, which if successful could help thousands get refunds of their compulsory paycheck deductions.

Two workers from California and two from Oregon, represented by the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and the Freedom Foundation, asked the Supreme Court to hear their four cases as one class action challenge, Just the News reports. 

William Hough, a worker at the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, filed his complaint against the Service Employees International Union, the Attorney General and governor of California in 2018. William Brice is a professor at California State University Dominguez Hills and filed against the California Faculty Association in 2018. 

“For decades, union bosses dipped into the paychecks of many workers who were not union members and used their money to finance activities those workers fiercely opposed,” National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation President Mark Mix said. “They continued seizing dues despite workers’ pleas and warning from the Supreme Court that their actions were likely unconstitutional.” 

All four workers allege their unions took dues from workers’ paychecks before a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2018 that ruled union dues as a condition of public-sector employment violated the First Amendment. 

“The Supreme Court did not create a government employee’s First Amendment right not to be forced to fund a union as a condition of employment,” Freedom Foundation Chief Litigation Counsel Eric Stahlfeld said. “Rather, the Court affirmed Janus v. AFSCME what it had been signaling to unions in three previous cases starting with Knox, that the right had always existed and simply needed to be recognized.”

“Because of the statute of limitations, a ruling in these workers’ favor would only force union bosses to return a small portion of the billions of dollars nationwide they unlawfully stole from public employees’ paychecks,” he added. 

Image:

Opinion

View All

UK man charged over burning Quran in political protest sees verdict overturned in High Court

"CPS has spent hundreds of thousands of pounds trying to bring one back via the back door – and one t...

BRIAN MCNICOLL: Drug costs set to plummet thanks to Trump’s historic reforms

Trump's political opponents naturally took issue with the president's drug reform progress, but Trump...

JILLIAN BALOW: Why I want to represent Wyoming in joining President Trump to disrupt Washington

President Trump, the Disruptor in Chief, has done what few politicians have the courage to do—exactly...

Over 500 bags of human remains found in Cartel-ravaged Guadalajara near World Cup venue

The discoveries are centered in and around Guadalajara, the capital of Jalisco state, where at least ...