Connect with us
This recession has not only meant the most staggering job losses since WWII, but the recovery has also been excruciatingly slow, indeed non-existent.

archive

Is White House disputing Bowles on tax rates or not?

Hours after deficit reduction commission co-chairman Bowles told a Christian Science Monitor breakfast that the president was indeed flexible on whether to raise rates, press secretary Jay Carney was asked about this â??flexibilityâ?ť issue.

Is the White House disputing Erskine Bowlesâ?? claim that the president is flexible on whether to raise taxes on the highest wage earners? Or is it sending a signal that President Barack Obama will indeed compromise with congressional Republicans on their major point of disagreement in the ongoing deficit debate?

Hours after deficit reduction commission co-chairman Bowles told a Christian Science Monitor breakfast that the president was flexible on whether to raise rates (â??I didnâ??t sense it, I heard it,â?ť Bowles said, â??not only from the team but from the presidentâ?ť), press secretary Jay Carney was asked about this â??flexibilityâ?ť issue.

â??Well, setting aside rates so that you donâ??t take my answer to this question to mean specificallyâ??to reflect specifically on ratesâ??if I told you how much flexibility the President had, it would eliminate his flexibility,â?ť said Carney, â??So the president made clear that he is not wedded to every detail of his plan.â?ť

Then, almost as if to reassure his supporters who want to raise taxes on the highest wage earners, Carney quickly added: â??The president has also made categorically and abundantly clear that he will not sign an extension of the Bush-era tax cuts for top earners. Itâ??s bad economic policy and we cannot afford it. He will not sign that.â?ť

Carney then sounded a bit like Bowles and commission co-chairman Alan Simpson when they urged compromise and praised alternative plans offered by Republican Sens. Pat Toomey (Pa.) and Bob Corker (Tenn.).

Obama, Carney said, â??is open to serious, realistic, concrete proposals about how we can get from here to there when we talk about building a balanced package that achieves the kind of deficit reduction target that he set, and that the Simpson-Bowles commission set, and that others have set.â?ť

He went on to second Bowlesâ?? remarks at breakfast that Obama â??wants to make sure [the revenue] is realâ?ť and that getting â??some major portionâ?ť of it from â??the top two per centâ?ť was the best way to go.

â??The president is very interested in closing loopholes and capping deductions where sensible both economically and plausible politically,â?ť said Carney, â??but the fact remains that the cleanest, simplest way to achieve the kind of revenue target thatâ??s necessary here is to go back to the Clinton-era rates for top earners — rates, by the way, that were in place during the longest period of economic growth — peacetime economic expansion in our lifetimes.â?ť

It appears very likely that Carney will be asked whether the president in the days and weeks ahead will be as flexible as Bowles indicated.

Written By

John Gizzi has come to be known as â??the man who knows everyone in Washingtonâ?ť and, indeed, many of those who hold elected positions and in party leadership roles throughout the United States. With his daily access to the White House as a correspondent, Mr. Gizzi offers readers the inside scoop on whatâ??s going on in the nationâ??s capital. He is the author of a number of popular Human Events features, such as â??Gizzi on Politicsâ?ť and spotlights of key political races around the country. Gizzi also is the host of â??Gizziâ??s America,â?ť video interviews that appear on HumanEvents.com. Gizzi got his start at Human Events in 1979 after graduating from Fairfield University in Connecticut and then working for the Travis County (Tex.) Tax Assessor. He has appeared on hundreds of radio and TV shows, including Fox News Channel, C-SPAN, America's Voice,The Jim Bohannon Show, Fox 5, WUSA 9, America's Radio News Network and is also a frequent contributor to the BBC -- and has appeared on France24 TV and German Radio. He is a past president of the Georgetown Kiwanis Club, past member of the St. Matthew's Cathedral's Parish Council, and secretary of the West End Friends of the Library. He is a recipient of the William A. Rusher Award for Journalistic Excellence and was named Journalist of the Year by the Conservative Political Action Conference in 2002. John Gizzi is also a credentialed correspondent at the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. He has questioned two IMF managing directors, Dominique Strauss-Kahn and Christine LaGarde, and has become friends with international correspondents worldwide. Johnâ??s email is JGizzi@EaglePub.Com

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

archive

Is White House disputing Bowles on tax rates or not?

Is the White House disputing Erskine Bowles’ claim that the president is flexible on whether to raise taxes on the highest wage earners? Or is it sending a signal that President Barack Obama will indeed compromise with congressional Republicans on their major point of disagreement in the ongoing deficit debate?

Hours after deficit reduction commission co-chairman Bowles told a Christian Science Monitor breakfast that the president was flexible on whether to raise rates (“I didn’t sense it, I heard it,” Bowles said, “not only from the team but from the president”), press secretary Jay Carney was asked about this “flexibility” issue.

“Well, setting aside rates so that you don’t take my answer to this question to mean specifically—to reflect specifically on rates—if I told you how much flexibility the President had, it would eliminate his flexibility,” said Carney, “So the president made clear that he is not wedded to every detail of his plan.”

Then, almost as if to reassure his supporters who want to raise taxes on the highest wage earners, Carney quickly added: “The president has also made categorically and abundantly clear that he will not sign an extension of the Bush-era tax cuts for top earners. It’s bad economic policy and we cannot afford it. He will not sign that.”

Carney then sounded a bit like Bowles and commission co-chairman Alan Simpson when they urged compromise and praised alternative plans offered by Republican Sens. Pat Toomey (Pa.) and Bob Corker (Tenn.).

Obama, Carney said, “is open to serious, realistic, concrete proposals about how we can get from here to there when we talk about building a balanced package that achieves the kind of deficit reduction target that he set, and that the Simpson-Bowles commission set, and that others have set.”

He went on to second Bowles’ remarks at breakfast that Obama “wants to make sure [the revenue] is real” and that getting “some major portion” of it from “the top two per cent” was the best way to go.

“The president is very interested in closing loopholes and capping deductions where sensible both economically and plausible politically,” said Carney, “but the fact remains that the cleanest, simplest way to achieve the kind of revenue target that’s necessary here is to go back to the Clinton-era rates for top earners — rates, by the way, that were in place during the longest period of economic growth — peacetime economic expansion in our lifetimes.”

It appears very likely that Carney will be asked whether the president in the days and weeks ahead will be as flexible as Bowles indicated.

TRENDING NOW:

THE TRUTH ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING: REAL THREAT OR HYSTERIA?

archive

Dystopia Alert: A Decimating National Debt

archive

Guest Columnist: Why We Must Have a Border Wall

archive

Rising Social Agenda Brings Luster to Qualified Dividends

archive

Connect