Inasmuch as June is around the corner and its still winter, it is time to revisit the issue of "global warming."
A sparrow does not a spring make, but in the Druid religion of environmentalism, every warm summers breeze prompts apocalyptic demands for a ban on aerosol spray and paper bags. So where is global warming when we need it?
In 1998, President Clinton denounced Republicans for opposing his environmental policies, citing Floridas inordinately warm weather: "June was the hottest month they had ever had-hotter than any July or August they had ever had." This, after the Senate rejected the Kyoto Treaty by the slender margin of 95 to 0. In fact, all the worlds major industrial powers initially rejected the treaty, including Japan. Thats right: Even Kyoto rejected Kyoto.
That same year, CNNs Margaret Carlson remarked that when her neighbors experienced temperate weather at Christmas, global warming was the word on everyones lips. Adding to the worlds supply of hot air, she said global warming was the big sleeper issue.
Well, this year, Washington, D.C., had the coldest February in a quarter-century. What are the scientific conclusions of Ms. Carlsons neighbors now? In a single day in February, New York got its fourth-deepest snowfall since 1869. Baltimore got more snow in February than in any other month in recorded history. I wish there were global warming.
In 1995, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change produced a computer model purportedly proving "a discernible human influence on global climate." According to the U.N., there was not enough evidence to determine if Saddam Hussein was a threat, but the evidence is in on global warming.
The key to the U.N.s global warming study was mans use of aerosol spray. You have to know the French were involved in a study concluding that Arrid Extra Dry is destroying the Earth. In a world in which everyone smelled, the French would be at no disadvantage. Aerosol spray. How convenient. According to global warming hysterics, global warming would begin at the poles, melt the ice caps, and then the oceans would rise.
On the basis of such fatuous theories, in August 1998, the host of NPRs "Science Friday," Ira Flatow, told his listeners to look out their windows and imagine the ocean in their own back yards. Explaining that receding glaciers in Antarctica would dramatically lift sea levels, he warned that their grandchildren could be "hanging fishing poles out of New York skyscrapers," thus qualifying as the worlds all-time greatest "fishing story."
Since then, evidence disproving "global warming" has been pouring in. God knows how many trees had to be sacrificed to print new data refuting global warming.
In January 2002, the journal Science published the findings of scientists who had been measuring the vast West Antarctic ice sheet. Far from melting, it turns out the ice sheet is growing thicker.
About the same time, the journal Nature published the findings of scientist Peter Doran and his colleagues at the University of Illinois. Rather than using the U.N.s "computer models," the researchers took actual temperature readings. It turned out temperatures in the Antarctic have been getting slightly colder-not warmer-for the last 30 years.
The chief scientist for Environmental Defense, Michael Oppenheimer, responded to the new findings by urging caution and warning that "there is simply not enough data to make a broad statement about all of Antarctica." Thats interesting. We didnt have to wait for more data when lunatics curtailed the use of nuclear energy in this country on the basis of the movie The China Syndrome. That was hard scientific evidence.
We didnt wait for more data when DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) was banned on the basis of Rachel Carsons book Silent Spring, which brainwashed children into believing DDT would kill all the birds. American soldiers in World War II were bathed in DDT. Jews rescued from Nazi death camps were doused in DDT. It was a miracle invention: Tiny amounts of DDT kill disease-carrying insects with no harm to humans, protecting them from malaria, dengue and typhus. But in 1972, the U.S. banned one of the greatest inventions in modern history.
Now environmentalists are in a panic that African nations will use DDT to save millions of lives. Last year, 80,000 people in Uganda alone died of malaria, half of them children. The United States and Europe have threatened to ban Ugandan imports if they use DDT to stop this scourge. Environmentalists would prefer that millions of Africans die so that white liberals may continue gazing upon rare birds.
Liberals dont care about the environment. The core of environmentalism is a hatred for mankind. They want mass infanticide, zero population growth, reduced standards of living and vegetarianism. Most crucially, they want Americans to stop their infernal deodorant use.