British High Court delays Julian Assange extradition, says US must ensure that his rights will be protected, take death penalty off the table

Assange's wife, Stella, called the case "shameful," and urged the Biden administration not to provide the assurances.

Assange's wife, Stella, called the case "shameful," and urged the Biden administration not to provide the assurances.

ad-image

On Tuesday, justices at the United Kingdom's High Court delayed their decision regarding whether WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange should be extradited to the United States, ruling that the US must provide assurances before the case can proceed. Assange, 52, faces 18 criminal charges in the US, most of which fall under the Espionage Act, for distributing government documents via his website. If convicted, he could face up to 175 years in prison.

According to ABC News, Assange's legal team had set forth nine points that they felt the US needed to address before extradition could even be considered by the British court.

While six were dismissed, the justices found three to be adequate concerns. In their written decision, they said that the US must provide adequate proof that Assange will be allowed to rely on the free speech protections granted by the US Constitution's first amendment, that the fact Assange is Australian not prejudice his trial, and that even if he is convicted, the death penalty will not be an option.

"If those assurances are not given," they wrote, "then leave to appeal will be given and there will then be an appeal hearing. If assurances are given then the parties will have a further opportunity to make representations, and there will be a further hearing on May 20, 2024 to decide if the assurances are satisfactory, and to make a final decision on leave to appeal."

Lawyers representing the US at the High Court have been given three weeks to come back with assurances.

Outside the courthouse, Assange's wife, Stella, called the case "shameful," and urged the Biden administration not to provide the assurances, arguing that her husband was "being persecuted because he exposed the true cost of war in human lives," and "they should drop this shameful case, which should never have been brought."

As ABC News reports, Assange's legal team has made it clear that even if the High Court rules that he can be extradited, they will appeal to the European Court of Human Rights, which would delay the case even longer.


Image: Title: Assange

Opinion

View All

Denmark 'deeply upset' after Trump-appointed special envoy Jeff Landry vows to 'make Greenland a part of the US'

"It’s an honor to serve you in this volunteer position to make Greenland a part of the US," Landry sa...

'You have blood on your hands': Australian PM heckled, booed while attending memorial for Bondi Beach terror attack victims

The incident occurred at the "Light over Darkness" vigil in Bondi, held to commemorate those killed i...

LIBBY EMMONS: Turning Point's pundit wars and the battle for America's youth

What the pundits don't understand is that we don't care about their feuds, not really. We have our ow...

Calls to release footage grow after two Afghan asylum seekers rape 15-year-old UK girl

According to the boys’ lawyers, footage captured by the 15-year-old victim is so shocking that it wou...