10. Weak Assimilation/English Requirements
The Senate approved Sen. James Inhofe’s (R.-Okla.) amendment to make English the national language and require those seeking citizenship to demonstrate English proficiency and understanding of
9. Gives Some Immigrant Workers Greater Job Protection Than American Workers
As reported by Robert Novak of Chicago Sun Times on May 24, 2006: “The bill supposedly would protect American workers by ensuring that new immigrants would not take away jobs. However, the bill’s definition of ‘
8. Hurts Small Business
The Senate approved an amendment by Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.) extending Davis-Bacon “prevailing wage” provisions for guest workers, but not American citizens, in all occupations covered by Davis-Bacon (currently limited to federally paid work). Small businesses would be forced to pay inflated wages to guest workers above the pay American citizens receive for performing the same work.
Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation described the bill as a “fiscal catastrophe,” and has said the measure would prove to be the largest expansion of government welfare in 35 years. According to Rector, the bill would increase long-term federal spending by at least $50 billion a year.
The Senate bill does not reimburse state and local governments for health care and education costs related to the millions of undocumented immigrants. While the underlying bill creates a state impact assistance account for future temporary workers, it is an unfunded account.
6. Social Security Benefits, Tax Credits for Illegal Work
The Senate rejected Sen. John Ensign’s (R.-Nev.) amendment that would have prevented Social Security benefits from being awarded to immigrants for time that they worked illegally in the
Provisions in S. 2611 would require newly legalized immigrants to file tax returns for work they performed while in the
5. Terrorist Loophole Disarms Law Enforcement
Heritage Foundation reported May 24, 2006: “The Senate’s immigration reform proposal … would restrict local police to arresting aliens for criminal violations of immigration law only, not civil violations. The results would be disastrous. All of the hijackers on (9/11) who committed immigration violations committed civil violations. Under the bill, police officers would have no power to arrest such terrorists.”
4. Insufficient Border Security
The Senate rejected an amendment by Sen. Johnny Isakson (R.-Ga.) that would have prohibited the implementation of any guest-worker program that grants legal status to those who have entered the country illegally until the Secretary of Homeland Security has certified to the President and to the Congress that the border security provisions in the immigration legislation are fully funded and operational.
While the Senate adopted Sen. Jeff Sessions’ (R.-Ala.) amendment to increase “real fencing” by 370 miles and add 500 miles of vehicle barriers, the House passed a bill requiring at least 700 miles of “real fencing”, a more likely needed amount to secure the 2,000 mile long border.
3. Unprecedented Wave of Immigrants: 66 Million Over 20 Years
This bill is estimated to skyrocket the number of immigrants, from its current level of 19 million over the next 20 years, to an unprecedented number. Heritage Foundation: “…[O]
2. Creates Temporary Worker Program That Is Neither Temporary Nor Work-Based
The bill’s guest worker program would allow millions of illegal immigrants to qualify for permanent green cards within four years. Additionally, the Senate approved Sen. Teddy Kennedy’s (D.-Mass.) amendment that each year would allow up to 200,000 immigrants who cross the border illegally and work just 6 days a year (including self employment) to qualify for a permanent green card.
1. Rewards Illegal Behavior with Clear Path to Citizenship and Voting Rights: Amnesty
As noted by former Attorney General Ed Meese in the New York Times on May 24, 2006: “Like the amnesty bill of 1986, the current Senate proposal would place those who have resided illegally in the United States on a path to citizenship, provided they meet a similar set of conditions and pay a fine and back taxes. The illegal immigrant does not go to the back of the line but gets immediate legalized status, while law-abiding applicants wait in their home countries for years to even get here. And that’s the line that counts. In the end, slight differences in process do not change the overriding fact that the 1986 law and today’s bill are both amnesties.”