Among the universal truths of life are “death,” “taxes,” and “public schools need more money.” Of these three, two are true. Let’s discuss the third “truth,” which is anything but true.
You may be thinking — everyone knows the schools are under funded. You probably ARE thinking that because there’s a steady drumbeat of news releases and studies emanating from the education establishment designed to convince you of just that.
The Texas Legislature is again being called into special session to find a way to fund the state’s money-starved schools. But before it and similar bodies in the other 49 states convene to find a way to hand out property tax relief and (at the same time) give several billions more to the school system — let’s consider the facts.
First, if you believe that any state can implement significant property tax cuts while spending massive additional sums on schools, then perhaps you might be interested in purchasing a large bridge in
Another myth is the idea that schools are dying for lack of funds.
A Dallas Morning News poll revealed that 52 percent of taxpayers surveyed would be quite willing to ante up more cash if the state of
Regardless of any possible bias in the way these surveys were taken, the people who answered obviously care about education. But would they be so willing to pay higher taxes if there was more reporting of the facts?
In his book “Education Myths,” Jay P. Greene points out that education spending has been on the rise for fifty years. The Department of Education’ s own records show that after World War II, in today’s dollars, we spent about $1,214 per student. By 1955, that had doubled to $2,345. By 1972, it doubled again to $4,479. Since then, it has doubled yet again to $8,745. And ABC’s John Stossel, in his recent series entitled “Stupid in
So how could you do with a class of 25 kids and a budget of a quarter of a million dollars? The schools say it isn’t enough.
But the schools have the teachers unions and massive numbers of lobbyists, all working to preserve the government schools’ monopoly and to get unfriendly politicians un-elected. For that, they seem to have the cash. The unions represent the teachers’ interests, but who speaks for the children?
The children are not served by a system in which cookie-cutter school superintendents are handed rock-star contracts loaded with perks that most of us could never imagine. Remember Dallas Superintendent Michael Hinojosa’s car allowance that he got along with a car and driver?
And what about former Dallas Superintendent Mike Moses, who always insisted that his job was not about money? He walked away with $233,000 in unused vacation pay and retirement incentives. In
Then there’s the incredible cost of educating children who are in the country illegally. According to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the total national expenditure from grades K-12 for educating illegal immigrant children is about $12 billion per year. If you add the cost of those children who are born to illegal parents, the cost skyrockets to more than $28.6 billion, and $3.9 billion of that is borne by the taxpayers of
Presumably, if we didn’t accept illegals in our classrooms, we wouldn’t need bilingual education and another fortune could be saved. In
And so it goes. If schools really hadn’t gotten significant increases and if they didn’t waste money like drunken sailors, we taxpayers would obviously want to do our part. But before the soaking begins, would the state legislatures please take a look at how our money is currently being spent?