Top 10 Lists

Top 10 Outrageous Debbie Wasserman Schultz Quotes

Any chance that the Democrats would try to run to the political center during the 2012 elections went out the window when Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida was named recently to head the Democratic National Committee (DNC).  With a rating of 100% by Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) and a 0% rating from the American Conservative Union (ACU), Wasserman Schultz is a hard-core leftie.  These Top 10 Outrageous Debbie Wasserman Schultz Quotes prove the point.

1.  Death trap for seniors:  When Republican Rep. Paul Ryan unveiled his sensible attempt to control government spending, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz hysterically responded by saying, “We see a clear attempt for the government to back out of its commitment to seniors.  As a result, many seniors in America will be forced into poverty, and worse.  Some seniors will end up dying because they are forced to put off getting that pain checked out due to huge out-of-pocket costs that will skyrocket for them.  … This plan would literally be a death trap for some seniors.”

2.  Don’t call it ObamaCare:  Wasserman Schultz asked for a rules clarification on the floor of the House of Representatives, saying Republicans’ use of the term ObamaCare was disparaging to the President.  “Is it a violation of the House rule wherein members are not permitted to make disparaging references to the President of the United States?  In two previous gentlemen’s statements on the amendment, both of them referred to the Affordable Care Act, which is the accurate title of the health care reform law, as ‘ObamaCare.’  That is a disparaging reference to the President of the United States.  … It is clearly in violation of House rules against that.”

3.  Empathetic judges:  Wasserman Schultz wants federal judges who can feel your pain—apparently upholding the Constitution is secondary.  “Diversity on the bench is critical.  As practitioners, you need judges who ‘get it’!  We need judges who understand what discrimination feels like.  We need judges who understand what inequality feels like.  We need judges who understand the subtleties of unfair treatment and who are willing to call it out when they see it.”

4.  Class warfare:  Wasserman Schultz clings to the old stereotype that the Democratic Party represents the common man and Republicans only care about the super rich.  In actuality, Democrats are beholden to the Hollywood elite, academia, gay activists, feminists, and public employee unions—not exactly the Woody Guthrie crowd.  Says Wasserman Schultz:  “We must expose the stark difference between the Democrats fighting for the middle class and Republicans fighting for the elite and the ultra-wealthy.”

5.  Belittling to include military:  When the House Judiciary Committee considered adding an amendment to include attacks against military veterans to hate crimes legislation, Wasserman Schultz said that would be belittling to gays, blacks and Jews:  “I represent one of the largest gay populations in the United States of America.  One of the largest Jewish populations in the United States of America.  Our region has a very large African-American population.  It really is belittling of the respect that we should have for these groups to suggest that members of the armed services have somehow systematically been the victims of hate crimes.”

6.  Global warming death knell:  Wasserman Schultz must have drunk a large portion of global-warming-hysteria Kool-Aid.  Here she is predicting catastrophe for Florida due to rising temperatures:  “The effects of global warming threaten global environmental upheaval over the coming century.  But for South Florida and the Everglades, it could be our death knell if urgent action is not taken.”

7.  Demonizes Tea Party:  Wasserman Schultz held a small rally last year outside the office of Republican Allen West, denouncing the war hero who was running for the Florida congressional seat he eventually won.  Explaining the difference between the expression of her First Amendment rights and Tea Party rallies, she said, “I don’t see any swastikas or any pictures of the President in black face or burned in effigy here.  The difference between the way we express our First Amendment rights and the way I’ve seen Tea Party extremists—Republican Tea Party extremists—express their right is dramatically different.”

8.  “Mommy, are you going to get shot”:  After Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot in Arizona, Wasserman Schultz used her daughter’s anxiety to score political points:  “After my daughter heard that, you know, Gabby had been shot, the first thing she asked me was, you know, ‘Mommy, are you going to get shot?  Does that mean you’re going to get shot?  … But Mommy, Florida’s going to pass an immigration law like Arizona and then people are going to be mad at you.’ ”

9.  Union rabble-rouser:  Wasserman Schultz, in an address at George Washington University, said that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker deserved the “organizer-of-the-year award” for energizing public-employee unions after trying to rein in the cost to the state of their lucrative pensions and health care benefits.  “The sleeping giant has been awakened,” she said, according to Politico.

10.  Democrats’ communication problem:  Wasserman Schultz echoes President Obama’s assertion that Democratic election woes are due to not communicating all their accomplishments, not that they’ve pushed unpopular policies.  At her first press conference as DNC chairwoman, she said:  “This past election was tough.  We must do a better job of clearly articulating our accomplishments to the American people.”

Sign Up
  • apksr

    She will be first in line for the gulag when her lefties take over. Another “Useful Idiot”. Liberalism truly is a mental disorder!

  • Don Lain

    Talk about a nappy headed hoe!

  • Genna2

    1. If there is any discernable difference between death traps and death panels I don’t know what it is. Sarah Palin was skewered by the left – and still is – for using the term “death panels” with regard to Obamacare but, as we’ve come to expect, there was no similar response when Wasserman accused her Republican colleagues of repairing entitlement programs by killing seniors.

    2. Wasserman apparently had cotton in her ears when Democrats in Congress routinely insulted President Bush and accused him of a wide range of illegal, immoral and unethical activities. And where was she when her colleague, Alan Grayson, said on the House floor that the Republican idea of healthcare reform is for sick people to die quickly?

    3. Life is unfair and it isn’t the job of judges (or the purpose of our judicial system) to level the playing field and provide compassionate redress to those citizens who they determine are deserving of a helping hand. Justice is blind – or should be – to the identity and circumstances of the litigants.

    4. Democrats fight for the middle class – most of whom are white – by raising our taxes, pushing job-killing policies, spending our economy into oblivion and accusing us of bigotry and racism whenever it serves their political purpose. With friends like Democrats, the middle class in America needs no enemies.

    5. Wasserman is another in a long list of Democrats (Obama and Holder included) who believes justice is only for some Americans, not all Americans. Thus, she is a proponent of enforcing laws only after it has been determined that the law violater is not a member of a minority owned and protected by the Democratic Party and the victim is not a middle class, white American.

    6. Al Gore, step aside. Debbie Wasserman is the Global Warming Genius who predicted it would get hot in south Florida and the Everglades.

    7. Add slander, dishonesty and hypocrisy to the list of Debbie Wasserman’s accomplishments. Apparently, she didn’t hear Nancy Pelosi call President Bush incompetent, see her buddies on the left burn him in effigy for his war crimes or notice the Bush-Hitler signs at every anti-war protest. Justice isn’t blind in Wasserman’s world, but she certainly is.

    8. It’s quite revealing when compassionate, caring Democrats who are devoted to the best interests of children use them as political tools. It’s even more revealing when the political tools they use are their own children.

    9. Apparently, Wasserman didn’t notice that after the sleeping giant woke up, the people of Wisconsin whipped his a– and they did it without pumping their clenched fists in the air, beating up people and trashing public property.

    10. As DNC Chairman, Wasserman should know that Democrats do best when they hide who they are and what they intend to do to the American people. It’s a political strategy they’ve employed successfully for decades, but abandoned when Barack Obama and his band of lefties arrived in Washington. Believing Obama’s cool personality, good looks and silver tongue would override the American people’s natural instinct for survival, Democrats let it all hang out and the reaction from the folks has not been a favorable one. It’s time to round ‘em up and head for the shadows, Ms. Wasserman.

    Debbie Wasserman as DNC Chairman will be the gift that keeps on giving to Republicans during the 2012 campaign.

  • Leroy_Whitby

    Redistrict her out of political existence.

  • TheBitterClinger1

    Debbie Wasserman Schultz is not terribly unique to the Progressive/Leftist majority of the Democratic Party elite-she just has a bigger mouth than some. Her contempt for our Constitution, military people and anything we of the Fly Over hold dear is mainstream for the Left. While her voice and tone are particularly irritating her vitriol is in no way unique;
    Saint Senator Ted Kennedy’s attack on Robert Bork is still the standard for viscous LIES
    President Obama’s cruel “Typical White Person” remark about his own grandmother stand out along with “Bitterly Clinging” (so I embrace it)
    Senator Charles Shumer? Does a day go by without his attacks?
    I think FORMER Speaker Nancy Pelosi too but to be honest it is hard to remember what she says.

    No Debbie Wasserman Schultz is not terribly unique–but really irritating.


  • Eddieb1

    She is the one person (I’ll be nice today) that I cannot stand to watch when she’s on tv, (and I like to listen to diverse opinions). She’s shrill, vile, and condenscending, and that’s when she’s in a nice mood. I can’t believe we’re going to see that puss (and I DO mean puss) more now. YUCKKKK !!!!

  • supernatural_witness

    Where are all the anti zionist trolls? You trolls do realize that Debbie is the most Jewish Jew that ever Jewed don’t you? I guess Jewish is Ok as long as it is liberal? Is it only Neo Cons and non Jews who favor Israel’s existence that bring out your spewing venom? I noticed Krauthammer was being blasted for agreeing to Jewish occupation of their own country why not blast Schultz, an actual Zionist?

    For the record, the Jews were there first by several thousand years before the Palestinian squatters showed up to occupy Israel’s homeland.

  • David

    She is just JAIL

    Just Another Insane Liberal.

  • DeepWheat

    It was a long time ago that I first heard the phrase “It always seems darkest just before the dawn,” with regard to a situation that then finally turned a corner toward a better, brighter day.
    In the struggle between conservatives and liberals for ascendancy and control of America’s destiny, the rise of Ms. Schultz to Chair the DNC strongly suggests the dawn can’t be far away, for surely it cannot get much darker… At the very least, it reveals the increasingly strident desperation of the Left-at-large and the DNC in particular.

    “Cogito, ergo Tea Party!” ~ DeepWheat

  • TampaMike50

    Great! This is the BEST news I’ve heard in weeks. haha This clearly gives the voters a CHOICE next year for president. With DWS and others of her ilk (Pelosi, Reid, M. Moore, Soros) now leaders and MAINSTREAM leaders of the Democratic Party; it only serves to differentiate to the Democrats who aren’t nutjobs what Obama is really about. Can there be any doubt that SHE is the person he wants at the DNC helm? I think not. That’s fine, and will make it much easier to beat him and his zoo full of loons and idiots in Nov 2012. We Republicans are against him; I believe at least half the Independents are or have moved away from him; and I am almost positive 30-50% of real Democrats will not support him either by making moves like these. Each and everytime she opens her mouth; his approval ratings will go even lower. What a wonderful idea to put her in charge of the ‘clattering train.’ hahahaha

  • Bill_Den

    I don’t understand why Republican Representatives who have an equal forum in the House don’t challenge Wasserman-Schultz more readily and forcefully when she makes such obviously unsubstantiated accusations. That makes her a perfect target. Is there no GOP member with a set of balls?

    It’s no wonder Donald Trump has suddenly become so popular. He’s the only one who fires back at these left-wing ideologues. You’d think Republicans would see the results and get the message. I guess that’s asking too much. It’s a lot easier just to start crying.

    As I understand it,Wasserman-Shultz was so arrogant in high school, her fellow students used to write ditties on the walls about her like the one that follows:

    Were you to examine some defective adults,
    And find there a woman without any pulse,
    With soiled hair begotten,
    And mouthfuls of cotton,
    Gazing you’d be at Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

  • PR_Ohio

    Listen to this woman. She is simply spewing the bile of what Progressive-ism really is. Just like with Obama, we should heed her words, and UNDERSTAND the correct context according to how these neo-Marxists use language. If more people had the wherewithal to understood what Obama REALLY meant when he said things like “Fundamentally Transforming America” they never would have elected this Constitutionally intelligible fraud and America-hating communist sympathizer to the office of president.

    Heed her, for what she says is EXACTLY what the Progressive Left intends for America.

  • Indiola

    Or SLUT. stupid liberals & useless turds!

  • hughglass

    A world class NYC Yenta. Can you imagine being married to this beast? Her husband spends a fortune to keep her in Washington and away from home 90% of the time. Smart man. Probably plays to a 2 or 3!!!!

  • montegoblack

    I think from now on expensive gas will be called OBAMAGAS. Did you see the price of OBAMAGAS today? I think this is the last time I will fill up under $4.00 a gallon ($3.95 in Wis.4-16-11) for a long time. Thank you Wasserman Schultz for pointing out what really gets your panties in a knotted bundle.

  • Natasha

    Whenever I see her a few thoughts run through my mind:

    + A female Krugman, Olbermann, or Weiner
    + I didn’t know it was possible to in comparison make Barbara Boxer look nice, intelligent, fair, and honest.
    + Can the Republicans buy ad time just showing her talk?
    + Baby killer, baby killer, baby killer

  • RenegadeScholar

    Civility, Democrat-style.

  • Telescoping You


    Uber-liberals, while sickening to watch, are as serious as a garbage-loaded run-a-way semi speeding at 80mph. And their drivers are always the same hysterical nitroglycerine sticks who have as much regard for pedestrian citizens as a pack of rabid hyenas stealing another dead carcass.

    Funnel them from the main highway of life to the nearest cliff and we will isolate the carnage to one easily concealed pit, cover with lime, and move on.

  • endpork

    I hold her voters in contempt. They are the ones that voted her in and she is just the posterchild for what Michael Savage said… Liberalism is a mental disorder.

    Anyway… if her voters put her in, she feels empowered to say what she says because they won’t vote her out of office. I’m in California… home of the true liberal nut jobs. If people want change, the residents of her distict will HAVE TO HAVE A CLEAN RALLY and “literally show” the things she says especially in relationship to the shooting in Tucson and the fowl language from the left afterwards and what Oloser said.
    Until then we are just giving her and the MSNBC crowd what they want… stupid attention. Do something Florida or shut up!

  • CodeMonkey

    Why is “Obamacare” disparaging? Doesn’t he stand behind it? Isn’t he proud to have his name associated with it?

    And, um, what exactly would a picture of a black man in blackface look like? What a moron.

  • JohnWIS

    Quite the con-game that she pushes……isn’t it.

    Anyone who is stupid enough to believe her, will only gain the life that they have……which can’t be much.

    Any senior who believes that we want them to eat cat food…(like Wasserman so publicly exclaims)……well, I find that most disheartening.

    When are people going to start getting it through their heads, that they would have more if they only quit voting in the Democrats?

  • 1TaxGuy1

    TampaMike50 you are exactly right. What a blessing to have Debbie Blabbermouth Shultz in a position of high visibility. She will do more for conservatism than anyone in the last 20 years.

    Also, Montegoblack, great idea. Obamagas and Debbie Blabbermouth Shultz, what a pair. Count our blessings.

  • Concerned4America

    If she thinks it is demeaning to the president to call his signature legislation Obamacare I guess we know what she really thinks about the act.

    One nice thing about this is that the line between the Democrats who are in charge the rest of the country is getting drawn a little clearer. He may not be all we would dream of and after all dreams are often not very realistic but Boehner is trying to present the GOP as more conservative. The challenge is for the conservatives in the GOP to keep pushing and more important clearly articulate the message and expose the lies that these people tell. I swear the truth is not in them or at least it is lost and can’t find its way out.

  • Concerned4America

    All great stuff but #10 is just too much. You would think that evil doers would at least be discrete about their plans but I guess at this point they have no shame or as the Bible says their conscience has been seared as with a hot iron.

  • RUexperienced

    I would like to see Michelle Bachman take down Wasserman in a debate.

    Wasserman would have met her match.

  • General_Relativity

    Welcome to planet Liberal, people, where hysteria, fear mongering, and chaos are everywhere. Some of the things she said are just plain funny. She would do well in comedy.

  • General_Relativity

    Makes me want to ask is “How the hell do they stay in office?”

  • Ol_Irish_Barrister

    That little douche bag is at least 6 biscuits short of a “bakers dozen.”

  • johntmcdonald

    Shut up Republicans! The Congress-girl is the best friend you have. Save your ammo for 2012, by then, she’ll have blown so many holes in the Democrat party that victory for Palin and the Republicans should be easy.

  • svenskson

    Good point, …”Democrats do best when they hide who they are…” One of their greatest hidden “secrets” as evidenced in their tactics for winning, they`re cowards. Easy prey. Hurry 2012.

  • Ol_Irish_Barrister

    I think the appropriate, descriptive word you’re looking for is “SLUNT!”
    (You figure it out!)

  • svenskson

    LMAO, you ought to submit to Webster`s, serious.

  • Light_V_Dark

    I’m an analogy kind of a person..Libs are diseased, feral cats. Conservatives are big, stupid, neutered, family dogs…

    “While self-hating Americans make up but a fraction of the population,” notes Dan Flynn in Why The Left Hates America, “their influence is great.” “They are museum curators, journalists, college professors, librarians, and movie stars. ”

    If there is no God, everything is permitted.
    Fyodor Dostoevsky

    If you were to destroy the belief in immortality in mankind, not only love but every living force on which the continuation of all life in the world depended, would dry up at once.
    Fyodor Dostoevsky

    It is not possible to eat me without insisting that I sing praises of my devourer?
    Fyodor Dostoevsky (I LOVE THIS ONE!)

    Read more:

  • RJLigier

    Two words. Crazy lesbian.

  • Light_V_Dark

    Oh, I am not as sharp as Dennis Miller, but I’m a Believer. And, I’ve been BLESSED with the ability to cut a person to fish bait. SARCASM, is a WEAPON, that I don’t use, only, on the Evil.

    I’m good at this, and I don’t apologize. Virtually ALL Libs, Girls AND Boys, are Adult Children Of The Damned.. On steroids, crack, crystal, malt liquor, heroin, LSD, THC, MDA, etc.

    Unfortunately, TOO MANY blog owners, take umbrage to my dicing up their little pals on these boards, and I get nuked, quite often.

    Sarcasm: the last refuge of modest and chaste-souled people when the privacy of their soul is coarsely and intrusively invaded.
    Fyodor Dostoevsky

    Read more:

  • Richard White

    “We must do a better job of clearly articulating our accomplishments to the American people.”

    I sincerely hope they do just that. Not only that, but I will cheerfully give them help get started (my daily good turn). In no particular order:

    1) Triple the debt
    2) Force through a “health care reform” bill that few want
    3) Raise unemployment to double-digit levels
    4) Raise inflation to unacceptable levels – $5/gal gas and rising food prices
    5) Expensive military involvement in N. Africa with no defined objective

    This is just a start. Perhaps Debbie can flesh it out for us.

  • Light_V_Dark

    Hell hath no fury like a narcissist mocked, or EVEN DOUBTED.

    Libs have no sense of proportion. Kent State is a thousand times worse than Tiananmen Square and 911, combined.

    Narcissists NEVER REACH THEIR EMOTIONAL MAJORITY…<8=Q Gotta smoke, brah?
    Narcissistic leaders are nefarious and their effects pernicious. They are subtle, refined, socially-adept, manipulative, possessed of thespian skills, and convincing. Both types equally lack empathy and are ruthless and relentless or driven.

    Pathological narcissism is a reaction to prolonged abuse and trauma in early childhood or early adolescence. The source of the abuse or trauma is immaterial: the perpetrators could be dysfunctional or absent parents, teachers, other adults, or peers.

  • endpork

    Nice post… may be true.
    Look at the guy behind her though… his eyes… maybe she has a friend in D.C by the direction his eyes are pointed.

  • Light_V_Dark


    Sarah Palin writes on her hand, or a goofy homosexual Republican has a “wide stance” in a public toilet, and Leftards go into convulsions, FOREVER mocking us.
    THE FEMINIST AGENDA — In their leaders’ own words:

    1. “The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified
    as a lesbian to be fully feminist.” (National NOW Times, Jan.1988).

    4. The most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant
    members is to kill it.” (Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood,
    in “Women and the New Rage,” p.67.

    9. “Let’s forget about the mythical Jesus and look for encouragement,
    solace and inspiration from real women… Two thousand years of
    patriarchal rule under the shadow of the cross ought to be enough to turn
    women toward the feminist ‘salvation’ of this world.” (Annie Laurie
    Gaylor, “Feminist Salvation,” “The Humanist”, July/August 1988, p.37.

  • Lor Ben

    I too thought they were proud of their healthcare bill as they raped Americans of their freedom of choice. Why all of a sudden is it disparaging to Obama to be called Obamacare? WTH is up with this distancing of themselves and Obama from this debacle? They know the American people are furious and ready for change….true change!

    Counting the days down till January 2013….

  • Light_V_Dark


    Try to watch the above video, without wanting to go and firebomb a Commune. <8=]

    Clearly understanding what disables liberals from wanting to defend their culture is today a mortal necessity – an absolute requirement if America is to be preserved and protected from Moslem terrorists and other folk desirous of her demise.

    The three great political pathologies of the 20th century are all RELIGIONS(MEA) of ENVY: Nazism, preaching race envy toward "rich, exploitative Jews"; Communism, preaching class envy toward the "rich, exploitative bourgeoisie"; and Moslem terrorism, preaching culture envy toward the "rich, exploitative West."

  • Metalmaniac

    The unabashed liberal is going to make it’s self extinct, simply by doing what they are doing today.
    I say give the commie/libs enough rope they will hang themselves.
    It’s fun to watch them act like the village idiot, that they so long ago called G.W. Bush.

  • Kent_Pittsburgh

    Great point by point analysis/rebuttle. Thank you so much for writing it.

  • wodiej

    Best thing that could have happened for conservatives.

  • wodiej

    I don’t like her but would you want someone calling a female you care about a slut? Uncalled for.

  • wodiej

    That’s as nasty as the first comment. How would you like it if someone called your Mom, daughter or wife those names? When you all do that you are acting as stupid as liberals.

  • wodiej

    Well said-that rocks.

  • mommabee


  • Guest

    “Mankind are governed more by their feelings than by reason.”

    I love to quote historical figures, especially Samuel! Even if he mistook a plural for a singular entity.

    I am always going to worry about-

  • ronzogarbanzo

    Adams perhaps given to speaking Middle English wherein man_1 kind_2….? Dunno.

  • Guest

    I have always wondered about that. Did they use plural and singular interchangeable?

  • ronzogarbanzo

    Wish we could be there to ask, no? Just sounds right to me, can`t give it anything else.

  • tea_poet_society

    I don’t think it will be easy. The Republicans have no good candidates. I hope they find one. 2012 may be a Devil you know vs. Devil you don’t…like 2004.

    Trump is a joke. He’s got all kind of problems starting with his leftist political contributions. The R establishment wants him out.

    Pawlenty is as exciting as pond moss. If anyone can send us info on him, please do. WTF is this guy?

    Palin… no independent will vote for her. None. I like her too… she won’t win.

    Herman Cain. I don’t know anything about him and neither does anyone else. May be good news story.

    Romney… “Romney Care” and lots of the evangelical types don’t like Mormons (personally I don’t care if he is a pagan… but the religious right is hung up on the Mormon thing)

    Santorum… I think he was part of the Terry Schivo mess. Demonstrated lack of maturity and he is phoney (but I guess they all are)

    Newt: Has woman problems.

    Unless an adult runs: Patreaus, DeMint, Perry from Texas… it’s going to be tough.

  • tea_poet_society


  • tea_poet_society

    thanks dude. please note a famous fable.

    Sticks and stones may break my bones

    but the Trillions leftists spend will bankrupt us.

  • Dave Bachman

    I totally agree with everything you said, except “good looks” ?

  • magzie01950

    Debbie Wasserman Shultz as the DNC Chairwoman. Now that’s a gift to the Republicans. She spouts one lie after another lie. I think she even believes some of these outrageous lies herself. The American people know that the Democraps keep playing these same old cards. This is another example of why we need Term Limits.. Debbie’s a toxic cesspool of liberal diarrhea of the mouth.

  • jimmy6

    …..typical teabagger and gop pig thinking……2012 will be here soon enough…..

  • svenskson

    I appreciate your rundown. It`s still early, “Hope springs eternal…” and all that. I`d like to see someone nominated on our side of powerful means politically, and holds the Spirit inside. I prefer the warrior class, but that`s just me.

  • Stratosaurus

    Calmen Sie DOWN, folks! She’s only going to make the Idunnocr@ps look all that much sillier as November 2012 approaches. Barring rampant stupidity in the lower sty, things might straighten out a bit by then, but there’s always comrade reidovic and the senatepiggies to deal with. Hopefully, the Idunnos won’t continue the majority in the upper sty after that election, and Barry the Wannabe-Stalin will be out of the white outhouse.

  • Stratosaurus

    Just one question — why is it that most pictures shown of Idunnocr@p politicians shows them with their mouths wide open, and their hands up in surrender?

  • Haironfire

    ” As I understand it,Wasserman-Shultz was so arrogant in high school, her fellow students used to write ditties on the walls ”

    Sort of like someone else in the Dem party.Goes by the name of Barak Obama. In 2008 a member of his Harvard law class explained what BO was like during his school days.” One of our classmates once famously noted that you could judge just how pretentious someone’s remarks in class were by how high they ranked on the Obamanometer- a term that lasted far longer than our time in law school. Obama didn’t just share in class- he pontificated. He knew better than everyone else in the roon, including the teachers.”

    Back to Wasserman-Schultz. No surprise here. She typifies the new Dem party- very, very, left. and she is incredibly annoying. I hate hearing her speak on TV. ( but that is just my opinion)

  • montegoblack

    My two favorite democrats are Obama and Wasserman/Schultz.

  • mmcglone

    Hey my dad was 97 when he passed. He never complained about his cat food. A little salt and pepper and he was go to go.

  • HappyBob

    It is amazing how, editorial comment aside, that the 10 quotes that many rail against as inaccurate, are 100% spot on. To suggest that older folks will die if you make in unaffordable for them to get basic care is both naive and cold-hearted. Where is that extra money going to come from? No, we have a responsibility to see that older folks, i.e., our parents and grandparents are given the resources necessary for basic health care — this is what they have paid into as they, for the most part, worked hard all their lives.

  • JLFla

    Typical use of projection from a morally vacuous, historically ignorant and economically illiterate progressive.

  • John Jones

    We all know that radical leftists never give it a rest , including in their personal lives. I see this wicked witch of the left has two last names causing me to assume she is married. Can you imagine what type of living hell it would be after a hard day at the office to go home to this crazy B at night? Man o Man. A fate worse than death.

  • sovereignguy

    I think you’re right. I like Mitch Daniels myself….not very exciting but can get it done.

  • sovereignguy

    don’t reduce yourself to their level.

  • hmstrtch

    Isn’t there a leash law in D.C.? Hope she’s had her rabies shots, in any event.

  • Light_V_Dark

    OIB…The only way to beat evil is to DESTROY her…Slunt, is mild compared to how these skunks slur us…

    Well, the word PONCE, came into my mind and I knew it was a pejorative, but, OMG, I almost had to be taken to the ER for O2…And, since Lestists are pretty androgynistic, I felt as if I had struck gold! Check this out..

    Keep hittin them…Don’t listen to the sniffing possums…

  • wodiej

    It’s not reducing myself to their level for calling them out for using vulgar language.

  • GeorgeStGeorge

    I thought that this was odd, too. Unless, of course, you agree that Obamacare is an unmitigated disaster, there is no reason to call it “disparaging.”

  • Citizen_Jerry

    Every time that twisted gargoyle pops up on the news, I head for the Food Network. She’s a strident pro-abort and just a hateful person.

  • Light_V_Dark

    Evil people despise GOOD PEOPLE!!&p=122785&viewfull=1#post122785

    1 The wicked flee though no one pursues,
    but the righteous are as bold as a lion. (Glow Ball Warning…Ciggggaaarrrreeeetttttttteeeessssss…TRAAAANNNNNSSSSS FAAAAATTTTT!)

    9 If anyone turns a deaf ear to My Instruction,
    even their prayers are detestable

    27 The righteous DETEST the DISHONEST;
    the WICKED detest the upright. (emphasis added)

  • Light_V_Dark


    Have you ever noticed that Poncing, Posing Possums, ALWAYS seem to attach GAY SEX, FECES or DEATH, to every insult to us? They actually don’t believe we KNOW what they mean…

    Sad thing IS, WE DON’T CALL THEM ON IT, OFTEN ENOUGH…Check the spelling on this satanic dust bunny’s call to kill the Bush family…

    Well, PONCE, came into my mind last night and I BING’d it…I almost had to be taken to the hospital, for O2…

    ponce; An individual who attempts to fake having intelligence, class, or culture.

    I knew he was a bit of a ponce, but what’s with the monocle?

    Little Dimmie called us, PIGS…

  • CodeMonkey

    Light, you’ve given me more to think about — I don’t go as far as you, but I may yet get to that point!

    That section jumped out at me because it relates to the maxim “we get the government that we deserve.” It’s easy to think of this twisted human being in the White House as something that’s been visited on us out of the blue, but maybe we should ask, “how did we let this come about?”

    I don’t equate narcissism with evil, or think that every liberal is truly either narcissistic or evil.

    I think most liberals are liberals because they were raised that way, or have always vaguely tended that way, and have never been willing or able to do the hard work of thinking critically or logically. Also, they always seem to surround themselves only with people who agree with them on everything, so they’re never challenged to think. I’ve challenged several liberal friends (usually ex-friends after that) with this, and they always explicitly reject logic and thinking. I’m serious. It’s bizarre. One said, “Well, sometimes our feelings are all we have…” Retch. Another said, “Logic led to all the abuses on Wall Street, so…” In other words, because some drivers kill people in drunk-driving crashes, none of us should drive.

    So I generally attribute liberalism to simple stupidity, not outright evil. Of course, that makes them useful idiots for all kinds of mischief.

    As for narcissism, the article spoke to me because it’s recently come close to home for me that there are people who are clinically, pathologically, narcissistic as described in the article. Who are so severely damaged that they will never “come around,” and will always inflict the permanent damage that they have suffered on those around them, and anyone they have power over. That’s because most of us can’t recognize that level of damage, and will always give someone like that the benefit of doubt that they don’t deserve. Some people have “issues” — and others are damaged beyond repair.

    Having said that, I don’t see them as “evil” – I have compassion for them, though I don’t want to have anything to do with them. I can’t help them, and they will only screw up my mind and my life.

    But if someone like that has it in them to rise to power and inflict their pathology on millions of people, they can create an incredible amount of misery. That’s what most of us would call “evil.”

  • Light_V_Dark

    In MY experience, which is VAST, being a recovered alcoholic…A narcissist WILL not change his/her mind, because she is incapable of SEEING TRUTH. THEY ALWAYS CHOOSE WRONG.

    I always suspected Hitler to be a homosexual. AND, DAMNED, if he wasn’t.
    The following link is by some Progressives, quoting something, verbatim, from a Conservative.

    The sniffing little geeks don’t dispute the veracity of the article, rather, they whine about how INTOLERANT, the homophobic Conscum are.

    Truth is, most homosexuals were molested as children, and it messes them up for life…7 of 10 of AmeriKa’s serial killers were…OMG….GAY. Cannibals and necrofiles. PC protects them to the death.

    Hitler DID persecute, effeminate homosexuals, but surrounded himself with MONSTERS*…PC is a mirror image of REALITY…EVIL=LIVE, BACKWARDS.

    FISCHER: So Hitler himself was an active homosexual. And some people wonder, didn’t the Germans, didn’t the Nazis, persecute homosexuals? And it is true they did; they persecuted effeminate homosexuals. But Hitler recruited around him homosexuals to make up his Stormtroopers, they were his enforcers, they were his thugs. *And Hitler discovered that he could not get straight soldiers to be savage and brutal and vicious enough to carry out his orders, but that homosexual solders basically had no limits and the savagery and brutality they were willing to inflict on whomever Hitler sent them after. So he surrounded himself, virtually all of the Stormtroopers, the Browshirts, were male homosexuals.

  • Light_V_Dark

    Code, Google around about, The Obessiah…Pictures, etc. There HAVE been super human Democrats…JFK, RFK, DP Moynahan, GIVE EM HELL, HARRY…Zell Miller is a good man…

    You’re correct, that most Libs are STUPID…Look at the nasty little girl featured in this thread! Since RFK, JFK, Moynahan…Most of the STUPID(SEXULARS), HAVE BECOME SATANIC.
    The Stupid Left thinks that Israeli settlements are an obstacle to peace. The Satanic Left wants the settlers evicted or killed because they are an obstacle to the Palestinians destroying Israel.

    The Stupid Left thinks animals should be treated like humans. The Satanic Left thinks humans should be treated like animals.

    The Stupid Left thinks the Middle East conflict is about land and borders. The Satanic Left knows it is about Israel’s existence

  • Light_V_Dark


    The TRUTH IS OUT THERE…Obama is a ROTTEN PRESIDENT! Yet, Sexular-Atheists will follow him into hell, or let him hold the door for them, and BBO heads back into the AC.

    Before the little clown was elected, I referenced, THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES…Voila!

    Why middle-class Lefties believe stupid things – because their friends do

    The emperor marched in the procession under the beautiful canopy, and all who saw him in the street and out of the windows exclaimed: “Indeed, the emperor’s new suit is incomparable! What a long train he has! How well it fits him!” Nobody wished to let others know he saw nothing, for then he would have been unfit for his office or too stupid. Never were emperor’s clothes more admired.

    Addendum; Hasn’t it bothered anybody, the vile, vulgar, call for DEATH of The Tea Partiers and other Republicans and Christians?

    “While self-hating Americans make up but a fraction of the population,” notes Dan Flynn in Why the Left Hates America, “their influence is great.” “They are museum curators, journalists, college professors, librarians, and movie stars.”

  • Light_V_Dark

    Today’s Commilib is doing NOTHING, but engaging in a Reign Of TERROR..NIHILISTS don’t have any HISTORY…THEY MOVE ON.ORG…


    4.belief in destruction of authority: the belief that all established authority is corrupt and must be destroyed in order to rebuild a just society

    5. Russian political movement: a political movement in late 19th-century Russia that sought to bring about a socially just new society by destroying the existing one through acts of terrorism and assassination…Simple-NON&p=124021&viewfull=1#post124021

  • 2War Abn Vet

    Don’t you know; “Progressive” is the modern code word for “Marxist”.

  • Light_V_Dark


    Leftists WORSHIP people who they deem INTELLIGENT…Leftists WORSHIP each other. Here is a post from another forum where a psychotic little man hating girl lets fly…

    There’s NOTHING That A Little Leftist GIRL Or BOY, Hates Worse, Than An

    Suzanne HISSED…”Many conservative women will vote Democrat next time. The have gone to bed again tonight complaining of headaches because they don’t have the stomach for racist pig men. They just want a clean-cut guy with an IQ of at least 100.”


    Paul-Lianna, FEELS that Christians, Jews, Communists and Muslimes are all EQUAL! He hasn’t a bit of problem with Muslims building a how many story building for Muslims, near Ground Zero.

  • Light_V_Dark

    Nutzies and Commies and Jihadists…Oh MY!

    The Secret to the Suicidal Liberal Mind
    Jack Wheeler
    Freedom Research Foundation
    Monday, Jan. 21, 2002

    So here we discover the secret fear at the source of the suicidal liberal mind. It is envy that makes a Nazi, a Communist or a terrorist. It is the fear of being envied that makes a liberal and is the source of “liberal guilt.”

    From MY thoughts and experiences…Miserable people(leftists-atheists and Muslimes) hate happy people.



  • MG

    Wasserman Schultz either does not know what she is talking about or she is offering predictions, not a facts.  Her comments are “high-octane idiocy.”  But then, she is trying to be another Pelozzi, so that explains  her ridiculous comments.

  • josex

    So as not to surprise, I am an independent who is much more likely to vote Democrat than Republican. I agree in part and disagree in part.

    1. If those two are about the same (let’s assume), then the problem, assuming you understand what Palin meant and accept it, is not with DWS but with those making the noise at Palin but not at DWS.

    2. I understand people wanting to argue points of merit and avoid namecalling, but it’s very normal to be angry and use your own names as someone might do by saying “Obamacare”. She may not, however, have been willing to reply with a similar name attack (something I might not mind doing in some cases with someone using the name calling already if replying in kind might help get a related point back across), so she took the path of trying to invoke rules.

    3. I completely agree judges should be humble and open-minded and preferably have a wide range of experiences. The Constitution is something that requires interpretation. No two people interpret the same document text the same way, and this is particularly true of much law text which has lots of vague sections. This nation is for the people, and I think most people want rulings that take into account context and actually dislike rulings that appear cold-blooded. You have to add interpretation. There is no way around this. And pretending that context does not matter or that people are robots is definitely not something I agree with.

    4. This is a case of everyone wanting their team (D or R) to represent the majority of folks. I’ll leave it at that and won’t take either D or R side.

    5. This is a case of DWS being particularly sensitive to certain groups, especially from a historical perspective. Historically, I think she is probably correct. Jews, blacks, and gays have gotten a much tougher call from the majority than have veterans; however, I am not sure that a hate crime is that much or any worse if against person X v. Y. We could definitely use some mechanism to address cases where biases exist in large measures in order to help resolve them. I don’t know that hate crime laws is the way, but I am not sure (I plead ignorance here as well).

    6. Without proof that one theory is correct or not, I don’t see why a person would mock. She invoked what many believe might happen if enough ice melts, and it’s going rather far to say those views have no basis in objective science. The main problem with that view (or any other one on this topic) is probably in not enough necessary information having being identified and recorded and with people matching equations to such incomplete data (and this can be done in many ways, where some ways do not spell the end of the world in the near future).

    7. This is related to 1: you are judging her based on things others have done.

    8. I don’t currently see the problem with this although context would help. Many politicians bring up material from letters sent to them or conversations they have had. That is normal. To see the political or prostitution angle, if it exists, I’d need more context.

    9. Ignorance is perhaps why I don’t understand what whipping you are talking about against the awoken giant. Her view is perhaps that she supports collective strength for workers of the sort provided by unions. I see pos and neg in unions. I would actually like stronger rights for every US citizen (decreasing a need for unions) rather than allow so much leverage to lie in the hands of individuals who get so many benefits from our US system due to their huge wealth and/or particular skill at trading, business, etc, as these skills, however important, do not deserve (IMO obviously) nearly so much lopsided favoritism. I think we should have more inalienable (nontradeable) rights as members of our nation.

    10. There are many people that like many of the things supported by Democrats. It’s the details that matter. Ds and Rs, the politicians, disagree on a bunch of these details as a matter of their existence apparently (and where individual citizens from opposite teams might agree, the dislike and distrust of the other team representing them for a few years probably gets in the way). We really need real-time firing of our otherwise fixed long-term rep (reallocating our “vote units” to a different rep, for example). We have the technology to Amend the Constitution to efficiently allow for a representative body that is closer to a democracy on a per bill/issue level.

  • chiefpontiac

    Debbie Wasserman Schultz Syndrome is the result of the over use of peroxide….

  • LionLivesMatter

    One if the most distracting and annoying speech faults are people like Wasserman-Schultz who say “you know” “you know” in every sentence. If I KNEW, I wouldn’t need you to tell me, now would I?

    As for Gabby Gifford being shot, the media conveniently failed to mention that the shooter was a registered DEMOCRAT and a left winger.