Connect with us

archive

Court Strikes Down Net Neutrality Regulation

Court Strikes Down Net Neutrality Regulation (The Verge)

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Verizon v. FCC. The court has found that the FCC does not have the regulatory authority to prevent internet service providers (ISPs) from making some traffic run faster or blocking some internet services altogether, a regulatory scheme known as “net neutrality.” The agency lacks this authority because ISPs are not classified as “common carriers,” which must pass information through their networks without preferences.

The judge did rule that the FCC has some authority to regulate service providers; in fact, he left disclosure requirements that Verizon had opposed in place. The FCC has not yet disclosed whether it will appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court or issue new regulations, although FCC chair Tom Wheeler has stated that the FCC is committed to ensuring that the internet “continue[s] to provide a free and open platform for innovation and expression, and operate[s] in the interest of all Americans.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

THE TRUTH ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING: REAL THREAT OR HYSTERIA?

archive

Dystopia Alert: A Decimating National Debt

archive

Guest Columnist: Why We Must Have a Border Wall

archive

Rising Social Agenda Brings Luster to Qualified Dividends

archive

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Verizon v. FCC.

archive

Court Strikes Down Net Neutrality Regulation

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Verizon v. FCC.

Court Strikes Down Net Neutrality Regulation (The Verge)

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Verizon v. FCC. The court has found that the FCC does not have the regulatory authority to prevent internet service providers (ISPs) from making some traffic run faster or blocking some internet services altogether, a regulatory scheme known as “net neutrality.” The agency lacks this authority because ISPs are not classified as “common carriers,” which must pass information through their networks without preferences.

The judge did rule that the FCC has some authority to regulate service providers; in fact, he left disclosure requirements that Verizon had opposed in place. The FCC has not yet disclosed whether it will appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court or issue new regulations, although FCC chair Tom Wheeler has stated that the FCC is committed to ensuring that the internet “continue[s] to provide a free and open platform for innovation and expression, and operate[s] in the interest of all Americans.”

Written By

TRENDING NOW:

Connect