Connect with us

archive

Liberal wording is a laugh

Conservatives and liberals know the United States of America is being governed in a way that would be unrecognizable to its Founding Fathers. The difference is that liberals just don’t give a damn.

The Constitution’s framework, for those whose remembrance of it has been clouded by decades of a government whose resemblance to it is but a murky memory at this point, is based on “powers delegated
to the federal government [that] are few and defined” (James Madison). We are well beyond that. And it might be because we are so sensitive.

Limited to me (am I crazy?) means the non-essential parts are stripped out. When my suitcase is limited so I don’t have to pay to have it checked, the non-essentials are left out, things I don’t really need, and well, probably won’t miss.

The Washington Post yesterday, though, in its Wonkblog explaining how the government shutdown works, explained that “essential” parts of the government will stay open. Apparently the wording to delineate “essential” and “non-essential” government workers “was tweaked in 1995 because ‘non-essential’ seemed a bit hurtful.”  “The preferred term,” declares the Post sensibly, “nowadays is ‘excepted’ and ‘non-excepted.’”

Money people make purchases with when they have cash to spare to buy things not considered essential (“luxury items”) is called “disposable income.” I guess our government is just living in the lap of luxury– paying non-essential people to perform non-essential tasks. Disposable income? Why not? We can afford it, right?

The truth hurts, guys. Guess what, “hundreds of thousands of workers,” you’re not necessary. Nor did the Founders want you. Don’t go away mad; just go away.

But, being the soft-hearted girl that I am, since non-essential is “a bit hurtful,” I propose we refer to the shutdown employees not as “non-essential,” but as “disposable workers” or as “luxury people.”

Whatever you call them, they weren’t in the Founders’ vision.

Teresa Mull is the managing editor of Human Events. 

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

THE TRUTH ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING: REAL THREAT OR HYSTERIA?

archive

Dystopia Alert: A Decimating National Debt

archive

Guest Columnist: Why We Must Have a Border Wall

archive

Rising Social Agenda Brings Luster to Qualified Dividends

archive

archive

Liberal wording is a laugh

â??Non-essentialâ? is â??a bit hurtful.â?

Conservatives and liberals know the United States of America is being governed in a way that would be unrecognizable to its Founding Fathers. The difference is that liberals just donâ??t give a damn.

The Constitutionâ??s framework, for those whose remembrance of it has been clouded by decades of a government whose resemblance to it is but a murky memory at this point, is based on â??powers delegatedâ?Što the federal government [that] are few and definedâ? (James Madison). We are well beyond that. And it might be because we are so sensitive.

Limited to me (am I crazy?) means the non-essential parts are stripped out. When my suitcase is limited so I donâ??t have to pay to have it checked, the non-essentials are left out, things I donâ??t really need, and well, probably wonâ??t miss.

The Washington Post yesterday, though, in its Wonkblog explaining how the government shutdown works, explained that â??essentialâ? parts of the government will stay open. Apparently the wording to delineate â??essentialâ? and â??non-essentialâ? government workers â??was tweaked in 1995 because â??non-essentialâ?? seemed a bit hurtful.â?  â??The preferred term,â? declares the Post sensibly, â??nowadays is â??exceptedâ?? and â??non-excepted.â??â?

Money people make purchases with when they have cash to spare to buy things not considered essential (“luxury items”) is called “disposable income.” I guess our government is just living in the lap of luxury– paying non-essential people to perform non-essential tasks. Disposable income? Why not? We can afford it, right?

The truth hurts, guys. Guess what, â??hundreds of thousands of workers,â? youâ??re not necessary. Nor did the Founders want you. Don’t go away mad; just go away.

But, being the soft-hearted girl that I am, since non-essential is â??a bit hurtful,â? I propose we refer to the shutdown employees not as â??non-essential,â? but as â??disposable workersâ? or as â??luxury people.â?

Whatever you call them, they werenâ??t in the Foundersâ?? vision.

Teresa Mull is the managing editor of Human Events. 

Written By

Teresa Mull was the managing editor of Human Events. Previously, Teresa was an editorial intern at the American Spectator, as well as a production intern for the Laura Ingraham Show. She is a native of Central Pennsylvania and earned her bachelor's degree in Comparative Literature from the University of Dallas. Contact her at tmull@eaglepub.com.

TRENDING NOW:

Connect
Newsletter Signup

Sign up for the Human Events newsletter