Duke Energy soaks shareholders to pay for Democratic National Convention

The Democrat style of madcap tax-and-spend waste and fraud is nicely captured by the sad aftermath of this year’s big political convention, as reported by the Charlotte Observer:

Duke Energy won???t be repaid the $10 million line of credit it guaranteed for Charlotte to host last year???s Democratic National Convention, the company confirmed Thursday.

As the credit line came due, Duke made official what it had signaled to shareholders in an earnings report last November. Because Duke can claim the money as a business expense for tax purposes, shareholders will foot $6 million of the cost.

The DNC host committee struggled to raise money under fundraising rules set by the White House that banned corporate cash contributions. By last October, a month after the convention, it had raised $24.1 million of the original $36.6 million goal.

Duke???s financial support of Charlotte???s biggest event became a political football soon after the credit guarantee was announced in early 2011. Sidewalk protesters from FreedomWorks, a conservative group, waved ???Fire Jim Rogers??? signs as Duke???s CEO presided over the company???s annual meeting that spring.

(Emphasis mine.)  Those crazy FreedomWorks kids and their nutty ideas about fiscal responsibility as an essential component of freedom!  The shareholders are taking news of their gigantic compulsory political contribution pretty well, with a few exceptions:

Concord stock owner Bonny Stilwell questioned Rogers, who led fundraising for the host committee, about the line of credit at an August 2011 meeting to vote on Duke???s merger with Progress Energy.

???If it was something he wanted Duke Energy to do,??? she said then, ???it should have been his $10 million and not the shareholders???.???

Duke spokesman David Scanzoni said the company heard from few shareholders. The $10 million took 1 cent off Duke???s 2012 earnings, when the nation???s biggest utility earned $1.7 billion.

???That???s a (large) sum of money, but it did not have a large impact to shareholders,??? Scanzoni said. ???For most stockholders, it???s not on their radar.???

Rogers has maintained Duke???s financial support was for the good of a city making its star turn before an international audience, and so good for Duke. He has said the company would have also supported a Republican convention.

???At the end of the day we???ll do our best to get our money back,??? he said in a January interview. ???But if we don???t, it???s just a contribution we???re making I think for the greater good of our community.???

Dan Murrey, the host committee???s executive director, could not be reached for comment.

Duke???s convention support wasn???t limited to the credit line.

The company donated $1.5 million in in-kind contributions to the host committee for office space, furniture and other expenses. Rogers personally gave $339,000 in cash and in-kind services, including the hiring of a fundraising assistant.

Duke also gave $4.1 million to a separate fund that could accept corporate money to put on parties boosting the city.

Wait till they find out how much re-electing Barack Obama as President of the United States is going to cost them.

Update: On the other hand, Duke Energy has been making out like a bandit under Obama so far, raking in $700 million from the public treasury with the Administration’s help.  As Daniel Greenfield at Front Page Magazine puts it, “Big Government is an investment.”