Connect with us

archive

Obama: No deal on defense cuts

President Barack Obama told the press Monday afternoon that congressional leaders were approaching a deal to halt an automatic tax increase with the expiration of the Bush tax cuts on New Year’s Day.

But, he said, there was nothing yet in place to stop a slate of automatic, aggressive cuts to defense spending and other key programs–and wouldn’t be, unless Republicans agreed to yet more revenue increases.

In a rare public acknowledgement of sequestration–a plan that reportedly originated in the White House last year as an ultimatum to motivate Congress toward a deficit deal–Obama said the $1 trillion package of defense and domestic spending reductions “may not always be the smartest cuts.”

“We’re using an axe instead of a scalpel,” Obama said.

The deal reportedly under negotiation in Congress to stop the automatic tax rate increase would raise revenues on individuals making $400,000 or more, and families making $450,000 or more, netting some $600 billion in revenue over the next ten years. Though Obama has repeatedly emphasized the need to balance revenue and spending cuts, that agreement is almost entirely revenue-based.

And Obama doubled down again on his refusal to countenance any alternative to sequestration that didn’t raise more revenue.

“Any agreement to deal with these automatic spending cuts, those also have to be balanced,” he said. “Revenues have to be part of the equation in turning off the sequester.”

The immediate priority for the White House and Congress, Obama said, was to continue negotiating tax cuts, implying that the dreaded sequestration cuts will tax effect, and any deal to stop them will come after that fact.

The Defense Department has already released guidance notifying employees that they may be forced to take furloughs if the cuts continue further into the New Year.

“If Republicans think that I will finish the job of deficit reduction through spending cuts alone…that will hurt seniors or hurt students or hurt middle class families without asking an equivalent sacrifice from millionaires or companies with a lot of lobbyist or whatever, if that’s how they think we’re going to do this thing, they’ve got another thing coming,” Obama said.

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

THE TRUTH ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING: REAL THREAT OR HYSTERIA?

archive

Dystopia Alert: A Decimating National Debt

archive

Guest Columnist: Why We Must Have a Border Wall

archive

Rising Social Agenda Brings Luster to Qualified Dividends

archive

archive

Obama: No deal on defense cuts

Obama doubled down again on his refusal to countenance any alternative to sequestration that didn’t raise more revenue.

President Barack Obama told the press Monday afternoon that congressional leaders were approaching a deal to halt an automatic tax increase with the expiration of the Bush tax cuts on New Year’s Day.

But, he said, there was nothing yet in place to stop a slate of automatic, aggressive cuts to defense spending and other key programs–and wouldn’t be, unless Republicans agreed to yet more revenue increases.

In a rare public acknowledgement of sequestration–a plan that reportedly originated in the White House last year as an ultimatum to motivate Congress toward a deficit deal–Obama said the $1 trillion package of defense and domestic spending reductions “may not always be the smartest cuts.”

“We??re using an axe instead of a scalpel,” Obama said.

The deal reportedly under negotiation in Congress to stop the automatic tax rate increase would raise revenues on individuals making $400,000 or more, and families making $450,000 or more, netting some $600 billion in revenue over the next ten years. Though Obama has repeatedly emphasized the need to balance revenue and spending cuts, that agreement is almost entirely revenue-based.

And Obama doubled down again on his refusal to countenance any alternative to sequestration that didn’t raise more revenue.

“Any agreement to deal with these automatic spending cuts, those also have to be balanced,” he said. “Revenues have to be part of the equation in turning off the sequester.”

The immediate priority for the White House and Congress, Obama said, was to continue negotiating tax cuts, implying that the dreaded sequestration cuts will tax effect, and any deal to stop them will come after that fact.

The Defense Department has already released guidance notifying employees that they may be forced to take furloughs if the cuts continue further into the New Year.

“If Republicans think that I will finish the job of deficit reduction through spending cuts alone…that will hurt seniors or hurt students or hurt middle class families without asking an equivalent sacrifice from millionaires or companies with a lot of lobbyist or whatever, if that??s how they think we??re going to do this thing, they??ve got another thing coming,” Obama said.

 

Written By

Hope Hodge first covered military issues for the Daily News of Jacksonville, N.C., where her beat included the sprawling Marine Corps base, Camp Lejeune. During her two years at the paper, she received investigative reporting awards for exposing a former Marine who was using faked military awards to embezzle disability pay from the government and for breaking news about the popularity of the designer drug Spice in the ranks. Her work has also appeared in The American Spectator, New York Sun, WORLD Magazine, and The Washington Post. Hodge was born near Boston, Mass., where she grew up as a lover of Revolutionary War history and fall foliage. She also discovered a love of politics and policy as a grassroots volunteer and activist on Beacon Hill. She graduated in 2009 with a degree in Politics, Philosophy, and Economics from The King's College in New York City, where she served as editor-in-chief of her school newspaper and worked as a teaching assistant when not freelancing or using student discounts to see Broadway shows. Hope??s email is HHodge@eaglepub.com

TRENDING NOW:

Connect
Newsletter Signup

Sign up for the Human Events newsletter