Connect with us

archive

Smart power: Russia backs out of 20-year deal to dismantle WMD

It looks like Vladimir isnâ??t going to wait around for Obama to become more â??flexibleâ?ť after the election, as the American president famously promised during an unfortunate â??hot mikeâ?ť slip-up.  The New York Times reports that the Russians have announced the end of a long-standing partnership to dismantle nuclear and chemical weapons:

The Russian government said Wednesday that it would not renew a hugely successful 20-year partnership with the United States to safeguard and dismantle nuclear and chemical weapons in the former Soviet Union when the program expires next spring, a potentially grave setback in the already fraying relationship between the former cold war enemies.

The Kremlinâ??s refusal to renew the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program would put an end to a multibillion-dollar effort, financed largely by American taxpayers, that is widely credited with removing all nuclear weapons from the former Soviet republics of Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus; deactivating more than 7,600 strategic nuclear warheads; and eliminating huge stockpiles of nuclear missiles and chemical weapons, as well as launchers and other equipment and military sites that supported unconventional weapons.

The Russians claim this should come as no surprise to American officials, although Senator Lugar, who will soon depart the Senate after losing his primary race, says he thought the Russians wanted to modify the agreement, rather than terminating it.

The Times notes that the Russians are also booting out the U.S. Agency for International Development, which has also been working in the country for twenty years, but has lately developed an unfortunate habit of detecting election fraud.  Thereâ??s a general sense that Moscow is flexing its muscles and clearing out American influence.

One of the really big thorns in the Russiansâ?? side is missile defense in Europe, which the Times says Obama has â??shown little willingnessâ?ť to make concessions on, although thatâ??s not what he told then-Russian president Dmitry Medvedev when he thought the microphones were off.  In fact, missile defense was exactly what they were talking about when Obama said he would be more flexible after the election.  The conversation went like this:

OBAMA: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but itâ??s important for him to give me space.

MEDVEDEV: Yeah, I understand.  I understand your message about space.  Space for you�

OBAMA: This is my last election.  After my election, I have more flexibility.

MEDVEDEV: I understand.  I transmit this information to Vladimir.

Perhaps the transmission current Russian president Vladimir Putin is receiving more clearly these days is the shifting American electoral landscape.  Mitt Romney certainly hasnâ??t been offering any â??flexibilityâ?ť on missile defense.  Heâ??s been describing Russia as our top geopolitical adversary.

Or maybe this is all about Russiaâ??s unwillingness to countenance further disarmament of its more lively vassal states.  The New York Times article concludes with:

During his August visit to Moscow, Mr. Lugar said he hoped that the United States and Russia could use their past successes as a basis for expanding their efforts to reduce the threat of unconventional weapons in other countries. He raised the idea of trying to eliminate chemical weapons in Syria.

Russian officials, however, seem increasingly unwilling to let the United States set the agenda in global diplomacy â?? blocking demands, for example, for more aggressive intervention in Syria.

These developments go a long way toward vindicating critics of Obamaâ??s 2010 START treaty, which was assailed for giving away too much to the Russians.  That treaty was supposed to be a â??reset buttonâ?ť with Russia, but it looks like theyâ??re more interested in the â??deleteâ?ť button.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

John Hayward began his blogging career as a guest writer at Hot Air under the pen name "Doctor Zero," producing a collection of essays entitled Doctor Zero: Year One. He is a great admirer of free-market thinkers such as Arthur Laffer, Milton Friedman, and Thomas Sowell. He writes both political and cultural commentary, including book and movie reviews. An avid fan of horror and fantasy fiction, he has produced an e-book collection of short horror stories entitled Persistent Dread. John is a former staff writer for Human Events. He is a regular guest on the Rusty Humphries radio show, and has appeared on numerous other local and national radio programs, including G. Gordon Liddy, BattleLine, and Dennis Miller.

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

Dunkin Donuts Refuses to Get Woke: ‘We Are Not Starbucks’

CULTURE

‘Reaganesque’: Economist Tells CNBC Trump Could Shift Global Order In China Trade War

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Does ‘Impeach Trump’ Amash Have Financial Interests in China?

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Woke Mafia Panics as Game of Thrones Slays Queen SJW

CULTURE

archive

Smart power: Russia backs out of 20-year deal to dismantle WMD

It looks like Vladimir isn’t going to wait around for Obama to become more “flexible” after the election, as the American president famously promised during an unfortunate “hot mike” slip-up.  The New York Times reports that the Russians have announced the end of a long-standing partnership to dismantle nuclear and chemical weapons:

The Russian government said Wednesday that it would not renew a hugely successful 20-year partnership with the United States to safeguard and dismantle nuclear and chemical weapons in the former Soviet Union when the program expires next spring, a potentially grave setback in the already fraying relationship between the former cold war enemies.

The Kremlin’s refusal to renew the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program would put an end to a multibillion-dollar effort, financed largely by American taxpayers, that is widely credited with removing all nuclear weapons from the former Soviet republics of Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus; deactivating more than 7,600 strategic nuclear warheads; and eliminating huge stockpiles of nuclear missiles and chemical weapons, as well as launchers and other equipment and military sites that supported unconventional weapons.

The Russians claim this should come as no surprise to American officials, although Senator Lugar, who will soon depart the Senate after losing his primary race, says he thought the Russians wanted to modify the agreement, rather than terminating it.

The Times notes that the Russians are also booting out the U.S. Agency for International Development, which has also been working in the country for twenty years, but has lately developed an unfortunate habit of detecting election fraud.  There’s a general sense that Moscow is flexing its muscles and clearing out American influence.

One of the really big thorns in the Russians’ side is missile defense in Europe, which the Times says Obama has “shown little willingness” to make concessions on, although that’s not what he told then-Russian president Dmitry Medvedev when he thought the microphones were off.  In fact, missile defense was exactly what they were talking about when Obama said he would be more flexible after the election.  The conversation went like this:

OBAMA: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space.

MEDVEDEV: Yeah, I understand.  I understand your message about space.  Space for you…

OBAMA: This is my last election.  After my election, I have more flexibility.

MEDVEDEV: I understand.  I transmit this information to Vladimir.

Perhaps the transmission current Russian president Vladimir Putin is receiving more clearly these days is the shifting American electoral landscape.  Mitt Romney certainly hasn’t been offering any “flexibility” on missile defense.  He’s been describing Russia as our top geopolitical adversary.

Or maybe this is all about Russia’s unwillingness to countenance further disarmament of its more lively vassal states.  The New York Times article concludes with:

During his August visit to Moscow, Mr. Lugar said he hoped that the United States and Russia could use their past successes as a basis for expanding their efforts to reduce the threat of unconventional weapons in other countries. He raised the idea of trying to eliminate chemical weapons in Syria.

Russian officials, however, seem increasingly unwilling to let the United States set the agenda in global diplomacy — blocking demands, for example, for more aggressive intervention in Syria.

These developments go a long way toward vindicating critics of Obama’s 2010 START treaty, which was assailed for giving away too much to the Russians.  That treaty was supposed to be a “reset button” with Russia, but it looks like they’re more interested in the “delete” button.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

TRENDING NOW:

Dunkin Donuts Refuses to Get Woke: ‘We Are Not Starbucks’

CULTURE

‘Reaganesque’: Economist Tells CNBC Trump Could Shift Global Order In China Trade War

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Does ‘Impeach Trump’ Amash Have Financial Interests in China?

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Woke Mafia Panics as Game of Thrones Slays Queen SJW

CULTURE

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter