Connect with us

archive

Princeton economist asks Obama to stop misrepresenting his analysis of Romney tax plan

The Obama campaign has been playing fast and loose with the truth to attack Mitt Romney’s tax reform proposals, in a desperate rush to get the public thinking that Romney wants to raise tax increases on the “middle class.”

The Weekly Standard reports that one Obama campaign press release declares, “In fact, Harvard economist Martin Feldstein and Princeton economist Harvey Rosen both concede that paying for Romney’s tax cuts would require large tax increases on families making between $100,000 and $200,000.”

That’s kind of funny on its face, because one doesn’t get the impression that Obama is usually talking about six-figure incomes when he professes his undying love for the “middle class.”  And if you make one dollar above that $200,000 limit, Barack Obama can’t wait to raise your taxes through the roof.  $200k is the point at which the Sainted Middle Class instantly becomes, without transition, The Evil Rich.  If you make over $200k per year, Obama and his crew think it is immoral for you to raise objections when he “asks” you to “contribute your fair share.”

But the Obama claim isn’t true anyway, and one of those economists, Harvey Rosen of Princeton, wants Obama to stop misrepresenting his work.  As he noted in an email to the Weekly Standard, the only way he thinks Team Obama can claim Romney wants to raise middle class taxes is to assume he wants to keep the ObamaCare tax hike on the middle class in place. 

“The main conclusion of my study,” writes Rosen, “is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same.  That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.”

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

The Divided State of Britain.

CULTURE

Gulf of Oman 'attack': Oil tankers on fire amid rising tensions between Iran and rivals Gulf of Oman 'attack': Oil tankers on fire amid rising tensions between Iran and rivals

Don’t Rush to War with Iran Over Some Tankers.

U.S. POLITICS

Democracy Dies with Chinese Propaganda.

CULTURE

Brooklyn Bridge, 1890s Brooklyn Bridge, 1890s

The DNC Sold The Brooklyn Bridge To The FBI.

U.S. POLITICS

archive

Princeton economist asks Obama to stop misrepresenting his analysis of Romney tax plan

The Obama campaign has been playing fast and loose with the truth to attack Mitt Romney??s tax reform proposals, in a desperate rush to get the public thinking that Romney wants to raise tax increases on the ??middle class.?

The Weekly Standard reports that one Obama campaign press release declares, ??In fact, Harvard economist Martin Feldstein and Princeton economist Harvey Rosen both concede that paying for Romney??s tax cuts would require large tax increases on families making between $100,000 and $200,000.?

That??s kind of funny on its face, because one doesn??t get the impression that Obama is usually talking about six-figure incomes when he professes his undying love for the ??middle class.?  And if you make one dollar above that $200,000 limit, Barack Obama can??t wait to raise your taxes through the roof.  $200k is the point at which the Sainted Middle Class instantly becomes, without transition, The Evil Rich.  If you make over $200k per year, Obama and his crew think it is immoral for you to raise objections when he ??asks? you to ??contribute your fair share.?

But the Obama claim isn??t true anyway, and one of those economists, Harvey Rosen of Princeton, wants Obama to stop misrepresenting his work.  As he noted in an email to the Weekly Standard, the only way he thinks Team Obama can claim Romney wants to raise middle class taxes is to assume he wants to keep the ObamaCare tax hike on the middle class in place. 

??The main conclusion of my study,? writes Rosen, ??is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same.  That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.?

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

John Hayward began his blogging career as a guest writer at Hot Air under the pen name "Doctor Zero," producing a collection of essays entitled Doctor Zero: Year One. He is a great admirer of free-market thinkers such as Arthur Laffer, Milton Friedman, and Thomas Sowell. He writes both political and cultural commentary, including book and movie reviews. An avid fan of horror and fantasy fiction, he has produced an e-book collection of short horror stories entitled Persistent Dread. John is a former staff writer for Human Events. He is a regular guest on the Rusty Humphries radio show, and has appeared on numerous other local and national radio programs, including G. Gordon Liddy, BattleLine, and Dennis Miller.

TRENDING NOW:

The Divided State of Britain.

CULTURE

Gulf of Oman 'attack': Oil tankers on fire amid rising tensions between Iran and rivals Gulf of Oman 'attack': Oil tankers on fire amid rising tensions between Iran and rivals

Don’t Rush to War with Iran Over Some Tankers.

U.S. POLITICS

Democracy Dies with Chinese Propaganda.

CULTURE

Brooklyn Bridge, 1890s Brooklyn Bridge, 1890s

The DNC Sold The Brooklyn Bridge To The FBI.

U.S. POLITICS

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter