Shell’s arctic drilling plans have stalled due to a number of obstacles including needed government permits, a slow summer ice melt, an OK from the Coast Guard, and if environmentalists have their way, sea raspberry coral.
The multinational oil and gas company hoped to start drilling five exploratory wells in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas off the northern Alaskan coast beginning July 1, but the four-month drilling window is closing fast forcing the to company to scale back their plans to just two wells.
Shell has been planning to explore the Arctic for seven years and has spent more than $4 billion on leases, permits, and studies to reap an estimated 20 billion barrels of oil.
Most of the ships are still docked in Dutch Harbor, but a key barge that is needed in case of an oil spill remains in Washington waiting on approval from the Coast Guard, which has said in published reports that important systems still need to be installed on the barge.
Robert Dillon, spokesman for Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said the containment vessel is the third backstop in a string of contingencies that would assist in a major blowout.
???The Interior Department said they have to have that approved and on site before they can drill, it???s going through a retrofit and the Coast Guard has still not signed off. So that is still a question mark,??? Dillon said.
???Hopefully, they will get it approved and up there in time to drill this summer,??? Dillon said.
Shell is also still waiting on permits from the Interior Department to begin drilling, and air quality permits from the Environmental Protection Agency to operate generators.
???[Interior Secretary Ken] Salazar is still holding up the final permit to drill,??? Dillon said.
???It???s been a challenge.???
Human Events reported in July that Greenpeace activists are in the Arctic planning to disrupt the operation with a fleet that includes a 237-foot ice-cutter, two submarines and a drone.
Deep sea coral
Now the Washington Post is reporting that a submarine dive has already discovered a dense patch of deep-sea coral that provides needed habitat for larval fish. Greenpeace says the coral are vulnerable to disturbances that will be caused by drilling on the ocean floor. However, the group???s discovery was 10 miles away from Shell???s drilling site.
Michael Macrander, a Shell scientist, told the Post that Greenpeace has decided to ???suddenly focus on coral because the public has an immediate knee-jerk reaction??? to the word.
Macrander also said that any impact on the coral, including a dropped anchor, would be ???local and ephemeral??? and the corals could recover within six months to a year.
Murkowski along with Rep. Doc Hastings (R-Wash.), chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, wrote to key federal government agencies last month asking them to determine if Greenpeace???s activities were lawful and if those activities would create unsafe conditions once the operation begins.
???Allowing intrusions by any group to disrupt or threaten federally permitted operations is a direct threat to the careful planning and safe operations necessary for these activities and puts in jeopardy those workers and our environment, as well as the subsistence interest of Alaska???s native peoples,??? the lawmakers said.
The government has not responded to the lawmakers??? concerns.
???We may need to revisit it,??? Dillon said.
The company is now counting on operations beginning in early August, which gives them two months to work before they have to vacate this fall for the whaling season guaranteed to the native Alaskan Inupiats.