Connect with us

archive

Food Stamp battle now moves to the House after Senate cuts

The battle this summer to renew a trillion-dollar farm bill to cover the next decade of spending is expected to divide the House along party lines as Democrats fight to continue funding 43 million Americans on food stamps while Republicans insist on reforms to reduce spending.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is one of the nation’s largest federal welfare programs, second only to Medicaid, with an estimated cost of $800 billion over the next 10 years.

But House Republicans have already shown their willingness to cut even farther when they passed the budget earlier this year, approving cuts of $13 billion a year in food stamps.

The Senate finished its work on the massive farm bill June 21 on a final vote of 64-35 that included a cut of $4.5 billion in the food stamp program.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans beat back efforts by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) to prohibit states from waiving eligibility requirements and to eliminate bonuses to states that he says deliberately swells the rolls. Sessions said in a statement his legislation would have saved $11 billion over 10 years.

“It is stunning that the Democrat majority—at a time when we are borrowing 40 cents of every dollar we spend—would object to providing even this small degree of financial accountability,” Sessions said. “Those administering the program seem determined to place the largest number of people possible on welfare support. Is not a better goal to see how many Americans we can help achieve financial independence?”

The number of Americans on food stamps has quadrupled since 2001 when more than 17 million collected the benefits, and is now received by nearly 45 million people. In 2003 the food stamp program consumed 64 percent of the entire farm bill, this year it is expected to total nearly 80 percent.

Additionally, there are 17 nutrition programs that overlap with nearly 60 federal welfare programs.

Rep. Frank Lucas (R-Okla.), chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, said he expects his panel to pass the House version out of his committee after the July 4th recess, and expects the House version to differ with what the Senate passed, including $14 billion in food stamp cuts.

“Although there will be differences between the Senate approach and our own, I hope my colleagues are encouraged by this success when we meet on the 11th to consider our own legislation,” Lucas said. “The House Agriculture Committee will consider a balanced proposal that saves taxpayers billions of dollars, recognizes the diversity of American agriculture, respects the risks producers face, and preserves the tools necessary for food production.”

The Senate achieved some savings in food stamp costs by banning lottery winners from the program. And, a Democratic amendment authored by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) that would have overturned the food stamp cuts was defeated 33 yeas to 66 nays.

House Republicans are expected to target fraud and abuse in the program, which costs taxpayers an estimated $750 million a year. That’s according to the Agriculture Department, which says there is fraud in about one percent of the total funds allocated. Overall, Republicans hope to cut a total of $33 billion from the farm bill over the next decade.

An effort by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) to prohibit assistance to North Korea under the Food for Peace Act was rejected on a 43-56 vote.

An amendment by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) also failed on a 45-54 vote to amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay higher wages to their employees.

An amendment by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) was soundly defeated on a 15-84 vote to exclude farm benefits to those making a yearly gross income of $250,000.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

YouTube Won’t Let You Watch Lauren Southern’s ‘Borderless’

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

DONKTUM: Restricting the Range of Consciousness.

CULTURE

Global Elites Started The Russia Nonsense.

U.S. POLITICS

Lauren Southern’s Borderless Deleted By YouTube. ENOUGH.

U.S. POLITICS

archive

Food Stamp battle now moves to the House after Senate cuts

The Senate voted to cut $4.5 billion from the program, which has grown to one of the nationâ??s largest federal welfare programs, second only to Medicaid.

The battle this summer to renew a trillion-dollar farm bill to cover the next decade of spending is expected to divide the House along party lines as Democrats fight to continue funding 43 million Americans on food stamps while Republicans insist on reforms to reduce spending.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is one of the nationâ??s largest federal welfare programs, second only to Medicaid, with an estimated cost of $800 billion over the next 10 years.

But House Republicans have already shown their willingness to cut even farther when they passed the budget earlier this year, approving cuts of $13 billion a year in food stamps.

The Senate finished its work on the massive farm bill June 21 on a final vote of 64-35 that included a cut of $4.5 billion in the food stamp program.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans beat back efforts by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) to prohibit states from waiving eligibility requirements and to eliminate bonuses to states that he says deliberately swells the rolls. Sessions said in a statement his legislation would have saved $11 billion over 10 years.

â??It is stunning that the Democrat majorityâ??at a time when we are borrowing 40 cents of every dollar we spendâ??would object to providing even this small degree of financial accountability,â?ť Sessions said. â??Those administering the program seem determined to place the largest number of people possible on welfare support. Is not a better goal to see how many Americans we can help achieve financial independence?â?ť

The number of Americans on food stamps has quadrupled since 2001 when more than 17 million collected the benefits, and is now received by nearly 45 million people. In 2003 the food stamp program consumed 64 percent of the entire farm bill, this year it is expected to total nearly 80 percent.

Additionally, there are 17 nutrition programs that overlap with nearly 60 federal welfare programs.

Rep. Frank Lucas (R-Okla.), chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, said he expects his panel to pass the House version out of his committee after the July 4th recess, and expects the House version to differ with what the Senate passed, including $14 billion in food stamp cuts.

â??Although there will be differences between the Senate approach and our own, I hope my colleagues are encouraged by this success when we meet on the 11th to consider our own legislation,â?ť Lucas said. â??The House Agriculture Committee will consider a balanced proposal that saves taxpayers billions of dollars, recognizes the diversity of American agriculture, respects the risks producers face, and preserves the tools necessary for food production.â?ť

The Senate achieved some savings in food stamp costs by banning lottery winners from the program. And, a Democratic amendment authored by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) that would have overturned the food stamp cuts was defeated 33 yeas to 66 nays.

House Republicans are expected to target fraud and abuse in the program, which costs taxpayers an estimated $750 million a year. Thatâ??s according to the Agriculture Department, which says there is fraud in about one percent of the total funds allocated. Overall, Republicans hope to cut a total of $33 billion from the farm bill over the next decade.

An effort by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) to prohibit assistance to North Korea under the Food for Peace Act was rejected on a 43-56 vote.

An amendment by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) also failed on a 45-54 vote to amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay higher wages to their employees.

An amendment by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) was soundly defeated on a 15-84 vote to exclude farm benefits to those making a yearly gross income of $250,000.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

Audrey Hudson is an award-winning investigative journalist whose enterprise reporting has sparked numerous congressional investigations that led to laws signed by Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. She won the prestigious Sigma Delta Chi award for Public Service in 2009 for her report on dangerous drug experiments by the federal government on war veterans, which prompted internal investigations and needed reforms within the Veterans Affairs Department. The report also captured first place for investigative reporting by the Washington, D.C. chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists and was a finalist of the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences Webby Awards for news and politics. Her breaking stories have been picked up and followed by major news publications and periodicals, including Readers Digest, Washington Monthly, and The Weekly Standard, as well as The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Washington Post. With nearly 20 years of experience in Washington as a newspaper reporter and as a Capitol Hill staffer for Western lawmakers, she will now lead Human Eventsâ?? coverage of energy and environmental issues. A native of Kentucky, Mrs. Hudson has worked inside the Beltway for nearly two decades -- on Capitol Hill as a Senate and House spokeswoman, and most recently at The Washington Times covering Congress, Homeland Security, and the Supreme Court. Audreyâ??s email is AHudson@EaglePub.Co

TRENDING NOW:

YouTube Won’t Let You Watch Lauren Southern’s ‘Borderless’

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

DONKTUM: Restricting the Range of Consciousness.

CULTURE

Global Elites Started The Russia Nonsense.

U.S. POLITICS

Lauren Southern’s Borderless Deleted By YouTube. ENOUGH.

U.S. POLITICS

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter