Connect with us
Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas sees the ruling as unfortunate, and as a step that "essentially puts an end to immigration enforcement."

archive

Arizona’s governor lauds Supreme Court decision, others react cautiously

Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas sees the ruling as unfortunate, and as a step that “essentially puts an end to immigration enforcement.”

The Supreme Court only upheld one-quarter of Arizona’s tough statute on illegal immigration, but state Gov. Jan Brewer, who oversaw the enactment of the law in 2010, is declaring victory nonetheless.

At a press conference Monday afternoon, Brewer said Arizona plans to begin instructing law enforcement officers to check the immigration status of people in the state when they are stopped or detained for other reasons. This stop-and-search provision was the only portion of the law upheld by Supreme Court, but Brewer said it was the most important part.

“I believe section 2(B) was the heart of the law,” she said. “I believe that’s where the majority of the concern was. Now it has been validated unanimously by the United States Supreme Court.”

President Barack Obama, who has openly opposed the Arizona law and this month released an order allowing some 800,000 illegal immigrants who meet certain conditions to stay in the U.S. without penalty, released a statement cautiously praising the court’s ruling.

“A patchwork of state laws is not a solution to our broken immigration system â?? itâ??s part of the problem,” he said.

Obama added that he remained concerned about the remaining provision, maintaining it would place Americans under a “cloud of suspicion.”

Republican challenger Mitt Romney, who spent the day at fundraising events in Arizona, released an early statement on immigration criticizing Obama’s failure to lead on the issue, but did not address any specifics regarding the law or the ruling.

Later in the day, according to pool reports cited by the Associated Press, he told reporters that the court should have â??given more latitudeâ?ť to the individual states in its decision.

In Congress, a number of Republicans were eager to embrace the positive elements of the court’s ruling.

Arizona Sens. John McCain and Jon Kyl released a joint statement sounding a call to continue fighting the state’s battle with illegal immigrants.

“The Arizona law was born out of the state’s frustration with the burdens that illegal immigration and continued drug smuggling impose on its schools, hospitals, criminal justice system and fragile desert environment, and an administration that chooses to set enforcement policies based on a political agenda, not the laws as written by Congress,” they wrote. “We will continue our efforts on behalf of the citizens of Arizona to secure our southern border. We believe Arizonans are better served when state and federal officials work as partners to protect our citizens rather than as litigants in a courtroom.”

The state’s Republican congressmen, including Reps. Ben Quayle, Paul Gosar, and Dave Schweikert, also released separate statements declared a victory, however mixed, on the issue.

One of the few conservative voices in Congress who did not see the ruling as a glass half-full was Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, who called the decision disappointing.

“Unfortunately, under this Administration, today’s ruling essentially puts an end to immigration enforcement since the states no longer can step in and fill the void created by the Obama administration,” he said in a statement. “This is especially bad news for border states since they have to deal with border violence, drug trafficking and illegal immigration.”

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who delivered the majority opinion, left open the possibility for additional constitutional challenges to the stop-and-search law.

Brewer said she expects those challenges to take place and said the state will be prepared to face them.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

Hope Hodge first covered military issues for the Daily News of Jacksonville, N.C., where her beat included the sprawling Marine Corps base, Camp Lejeune. During her two years at the paper, she received investigative reporting awards for exposing a former Marine who was using faked military awards to embezzle disability pay from the government and for breaking news about the popularity of the designer drug Spice in the ranks. Her work has also appeared in The American Spectator, New York Sun, WORLD Magazine, and The Washington Post. Hodge was born near Boston, Mass., where she grew up as a lover of Revolutionary War history and fall foliage. She also discovered a love of politics and policy as a grassroots volunteer and activist on Beacon Hill. She graduated in 2009 with a degree in Politics, Philosophy, and Economics from The King's College in New York City, where she served as editor-in-chief of her school newspaper and worked as a teaching assistant when not freelancing or using student discounts to see Broadway shows. Hopeâ??s email is HHodge@eaglepub.com

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

Piers Morgan and Ilhan Omar Piers Morgan and Ilhan Omar

What’s The Difference Between Ilhan Omar and Piers Morgan?

U.S. POLITICS

Everyone’s Gone Nuts. For Power and Profit.

CULTURE

Planned Parenthood’s Leana Wen Wasn’t Woke Enough And Nor Are You

CULTURE

CNN Platforms white nationalist Richard Spencer CNN Platforms white nationalist Richard Spencer

CNN Platforms Richard Spencer.

U.S. POLITICS

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter