We suppose if she gets into office and the Iranian madmen acquire usable nuclear weapons she’ll just turn on that famous charm of hers and shriek them into submission.
You know when someone lauds “nuanced responses” they have no idea what they’re talking about.
“It is both perplexing and extremely troubling that on the same week a report indicated Iran is moving closer toward obtaining nuclear weapons, Elizabeth Warren would call for a ‘nuanced’ approach toward this growing threat,” said Nate Little, executive director of the Massachusetts Republican Party, just one of several conservatives to draw a line in the sand over Warren’s televised remarks.
“What is needed right now is not nuance, but a clear, consistent and unmistakable message from the United States that a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable and won’t be tolerated,” Little added in a Mass GOP statement.
Senator Scott Brown also weighed in on his likely 2012 opponent.
U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, whom Warren is expected to face next November as the Democratic front-runner, issued a thinly veined rebuke of Warren without mentioning her by name yesterday, saying there is no room for ambiguity in dealings with Iran.
“If Iran obtains nuclear weapons, it would add a frightening new dimension to their campaign to export terrorism around the region and the world, threaten America and fulfill its promise to wipe Israel off the map. With the stakes so high, the United States simply cannot afford any misinterpretation of our policy toward Iran,” Brown said in a statement. “The leadership of the Iranian regime must know that their pursuit of nuclear weapons is unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the United States.”
I suppose when this “nuanced approach” fails she’ll be all for more of those sanactions that have worked so well.
Speaking of meaningless sanctions, Obama tried to enlist the aid of China and Russia, only to be met with silence. What a surprise.
Sign up to the Human Events newsletter