Planned Parenthood Spent More Than $1 Million to Elect Dems in 2010

  • by:
  • 08/21/2022

Your tax dollars at work... Funding abortions and democrat campaigns.

Planned Parenthood spent more than a million dollars last year to get democrats elected. They're still at it.

On March 25, the Planned Parenthood bus was in Madison, Wisconsin to protest against Republican Governor Scott Walker.

The Washington Examiner reported, via FOX Nation:

Here's something to keep in mind as Democrats risk a government shutdown in order to preserve federal subsidies of Planned Parenthood. From the Center for Responsive Politics:

In 2010, Planned Parenthood and a California affiliate together spent more than $700,000 on federal lobbying efforts, a Center for Responsive Politics analysis of federal lobbying records finds. By comparison, all other organizations that primarily advocate for abortion rights collectively spent $247,280 on federal lobbying efforts during the same period, according to the Center's research.

plannedparenthoodlobby.PNG

Planned Parenthood's political influence efforts hardly stop at lobbying. The organization's political action committee, for example, donated more than $148,000 to federal candidates - almost all Democrats - during the 2010 election cycle. The PAC spent more than $443,000 overall.

Republicans voted to strip the abortion group from receiving $363 million in taxpayer funds but senate democrats put it back in the budget. after all, it's money for their reelection.

Image:
ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion

View All

British schoolchildren more violent due to lockdown–causes developmental delays: BBC study

Nearly one in five teachers at schools across England reported being hit by a student in the past yea...

London features 'Happy Ramadan' lights throughout city over Easter weekend

The lights have drawn criticism from prominent conservatives who insisted that the council ought to s...

Polish foreign minister claims US was aware of Nord Stream pipeline attack but 'did not prevent it'

Radoslaw Sikorski suggested it was done by "someone who had a vested interest in it."...