Connect with us
Republicans are still going strong on reforming earmarks but with intelligence, there is work left to do.

archive

Hoekstra Removes Earmarks From Intelligence Bill

Republicans are still going strong on reforming earmarks but with intelligence, there is work left to do.

For the second year in a row, Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.), the top member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, has managed to strip all the earmarks from the FY’09 Intelligence Authorization bill.

Earmarks have plagued both Democrats and Republicans recently and Hoekstra credited the lack of transparency to the public for why he refused to include them in the bill. The bill passed with a 17-4 bi-partisan vote due the necessity of such vital information.

“Given the highly classified nature of this bill, the best assurance we can give the American people that Congress is spending taxpayer money wisely is to spend it on national security, not earmarked requests,” he said.

The bill will determine funding levels and specific authorities for American’s intelligence programs. Restoring public trust is something Hoekstra aims to do, albeit within the confines of a classified piece of legislation.  He said, “Even though requests for earmarks are made public, the classified nature of the underlying programs means that transparency for the public does not exist.” 

Two Republican amendments to the bill were rejected by the Democrats. One, by Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM), would have added the Senate Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act update legislation to the authorization and the other would have prohibited the intelligence community from adopting speech codes against radical jihadist threats.

Hoekstra said invoking speech codes on our enemies was like “McCarthyism in reverse.”

According to Hoekstra, the bill not only increases security measures but also cuts bureaucratic growth at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

A clean bill with no earmarks is a step in the directions Republicans hope to go but without the amendments prohibiting speech codes and FISA, it still falls short of what could have been accomplished.

The committee approved the bill by voice vote and  it will now go to the full House for consideration.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

Ms. Andersen is a news producer and reporter for HUMAN EVENTS. She previously interned for The Washington Examiner newspaper. She has appeared on MSNBC and Fox News. She has also been a guest on the Lars Larson radio show and the Jim Bohannon radio show. E-mail her at eandersen@eaglepub.com.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

Buzzfeed Bashes 14-Yr-Old Trump Fan, Celebrates Kids in Drag.

TECH

Al Jazeera: ‘Jews Exploit Holocaust’.

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

‘Reaganesque’: Economist Tells CNBC Trump Could Shift Global Order In China Trade War

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Salvini: ‘Extremists’ Are Those Who’ve Governed Europe in the Name of Finance, Multinationalism, Mass Migration.

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter