Connect with us
House Minority Leader John Boehner has brought to the floor a privileged resolution to censure Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) for his outrageous comment last week that the President was sending soldiers to Iraq to die for his amusement

archive

MoveOn-dot-Democrats Protect Pete Stark

House Minority Leader John Boehner has brought to the floor a privileged resolution to censure Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) for his outrageous comment last week that the President was sending soldiers to Iraq to die for his amusement

House Minority Leader John Boehner has brought to the floor a privileged resolution to censure Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) for his outrageous comment last week that the President was sending soldiers to Iraq to die for his amusement. The Democrats counter-attacked with a motion to table Boehner’s resolution. The Dems succeeded and Stark will not be censured. 

Here’s the Boehner Resolution:  

Stark rose on a point of personal privilege and apologized to the president and the troops.  His apology rings hollow. He should have been censured.

Privileged Resolution offered by Republican Leader John Boehner Censuring Congressman Pete Stark (D-Calif). 

Raising a Question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas, United States soldiers and personnel in Iraq are fighting to protect innocent Americans from being attacked by al-Qaeda and radical jihadists who are determined to kill the American people.

Whereas on October 18, 2007, in debate on H.R. 976, Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, the Member from California, Mr. Stark, stated: “You don’t have money to fund the war or children. But you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President’s amusement.”

Whereas, on October 18, 2007, in a press release, Rep. Pete Stark is quoted as saying:  “I respect neither the Commander-in-Chief who keeps them in harms way nor the chickenhawks in Congress.”

Whereas the Member from California, Mr. Stark, engaged in personally abusive language toward the President and Members of the House, including the use of language that impugns their motives.

Whereas, the Member from California, Mr. Stark dishonors not only the Commander-in-Chief, but the thousands of courageous men and women of America’s armed forces who believe in their mission and are putting their lives on the line for our freedom and security.

Whereas the Member from California, Mr. Stark, has failed to retract his statement and apologize to the Members of the House, our Commander-in-Chief, and the families of our soldiers and commanders fighting terror overseas.

Resolved, that the Member from California, Mr. Stark, by his despicable conduct, has dishonored himself and brought discredit to the House and merits the censure of the House for the same.

Resolved, that the Member from California, Mr. Stark, is hereby so censured.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

HUMAN EVENTS is the news source President Reagan called his "favorite newspaper" and we still hold high the Reaganesque principles of free enterprise, limited government and, above all, a staunch, unwavering defense of American freedom. You can also follow Human Events on FACEBOOK. Click Here to Become a Fan:

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

Everyone’s Gone Nuts. For Power and Profit.

CULTURE

Piers Morgan and Ilhan Omar Piers Morgan and Ilhan Omar

What’s The Difference Between Ilhan Omar and Piers Morgan?

U.S. POLITICS

CNN Platforms white nationalist Richard Spencer CNN Platforms white nationalist Richard Spencer

CNN Platforms Richard Spencer.

U.S. POLITICS

Planned Parenthood’s Leana Wen Wasn’t Woke Enough And Nor Are You

CULTURE

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter