As HUMAN EVENTS first reported, I opposed the Senate immigration bill because it would allow millions of illegal immigrants to get right with the law without having to leave the country. For most Americans, and me, that is amnesty and I could not support it.
Since entering this debate with a speech to the Heritage Foundation last May, I have advocated a no amnesty immigration proposal that would make it possible for all illegal immigrants to leave the country to apply for the legal right to live and work here.
Although several major news organizations reported that the Senate bill did include a self deportation provision, that simply was not the case. The Senate bill only included a requirement that Z Visa holders return to the U.S. Consulate in their country of origin if they wanted to apply for a green card but this was strictly optional.
Under the Senate compromise, illegal immigrants could obtain a Z Visa, which was renewable indefinitely, simply by paying a fine and passing a background check. Z Visa holders are never required to leave the country to get right with the law.
The purpose of requiring illegal immigrants to leave the country to get right with the law is not simply to do a quick “touchback.” That is a gimmick. The purpose of leaving the country to get right with the law is to require people to apply for the legal right to enter the United States in the same way all other visa applicants apply to come into the United States. Illegal immigrants must apply and be processed outside the United States to reassert the principle in the law that the only way to come into the most prosperous nation on Earth is to apply, outside the country, for the legal right to live and work here.
If a person applies from outside of the country and is denied, then the person does not need to be deported because he or she is already gone. If the person, however, applies from outside the country and is accepted, which would mean the person passed a background check and a health screening and has a job, that person has corrected his or her original illegal act and has been granted legal entry to America without amnesty.
While I strongly opposed the Senate immigration bill, I am not against every version of immigration reform. I stand by the no-amnesty solution that I described at Heritage Foundation and that Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison and I advanced during the 109th Congress. I believe it still holds promise if Congress makes another attempt at immigration reform this year.
Any future effort at immigration reform must reflect the following four-step process:
Securing our border is the first step. As President Reagan said, “A nation without borders is not a nation.” Therefore, we must make America a nation with borders. We must man the door. No temporary worker program should begin until border security measures are completed. And the border must subject to ongoing annual certification for a temporary worker program to continue.
The second step is to decide, once and for all, to deny amnesty to people whose first act in the United States was a violation of the law by requiring all illegal immigrants to leave the country to get right with the law.
The third step is to put in place a temporary worker program, without amnesty, that will establish “Ellis Island Centers” outside the country where American private sector employment firms can match employers with willing temporary workers who pass a background check and learn English.
The final step is tough employer sanctions and an employment verification system that ensures a full partnership between American business and the U.S. government in enforcing our immigration laws. Only stiff fines for employers and a consistent law enforcement effort will reverse decades of illegal hiring practices within our country.
I opposed the Senate immigration bill because I believe we can solve the crisis of illegal immigration without amnesty or a massive new federal bureaucracy.
Now that the Senate has fumbled its flawed version of immigration reform, I hope the House will take a fresh look at the issue. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced her desire to see a bipartisan immigration reform bill. If she is looking for consensus, I believe this four-part plan is a template for reform that many opposing amnesty can embrace. I believe this proposal offers a solution that those calling for humane treatment of the illegal aliens in our midst can embrace. And I believe this solution is one the American people can embrace. It is the real rational middle ground.