Connect with us
Media's suspicion of and disdain for The Rich continues with Congress' extension of tax cuts

archive

For Love of Money

Media’s suspicion of and disdain for The Rich continues with Congress’ extension of tax cuts

Money is the root of all evil.

That seems to be the media’s Sunday school lesson to audiences lately. First, they demonized oil companies for making too much. Then they went after individual CEOs. Most recently, they’ve once again turned on that group that forever threatens the well-being of America: The Rich.

Yes, according to the press, Congress has again bowed to the wishes of The Rich. It has cut them a huge tax break while the rest of America suffers and the national debt soars from the “cost” of letting people keep more of their own money. But the media, the Guardians of the Poor, are here to expose it all. The multimillion-dollar anchors, like NBC’s Brian Williams and soon-to-be CBS’s Katie Couric, are on the case! They are not at all aligned with the interests of The Rich.

The tax cut “clearly favors the wealthy,” said ABC’s Betsy Stark. “Critics” (which often means journalists) call it “a gift to the wealthy,” said CBS’s Harry Smith. As usual, to put these comments in perspective, it’s necessary to examine two bodies of information: what the media are telling us, and what they’re not telling us.

They are telling us the newly-passed $70 billion tax relief bill benefits The Rich. Obviously, a tax cut benefits only those who are paying taxes. As the Tax Foundation has pointed out, 32 percent of those who filed federal tax returns this year actually had no tax liability. Those people aren’t going to benefit from most tax cuts … because that’s hard to do when you’re not paying taxes to begin with.

They’re also telling us tax cuts are bad for our debt. CBS’s Bob Schieffer said on May 10 that “critics … remind us that any tax cut is just going to drive the national debt higher.”

There are two problems with that reasoning. One is the media view tax cuts as a “cost” to the government. This subtlety promotes the idea that the government owns your money already, and if they allow you to keep what you’ve earned, they are cutting you a break. By keeping it, you are draining the Treasury.

The other problem with the debt argument is that cutting taxes on capital gains and dividends increases the incentive to invest. That leads to more investment. More investment leads to more income. And more income means more tax payments. Funny how that works.

As The Wall Street Journal noted on May 14, “The tax payments of the wealthiest 3% of Americans increased at twice the rate of the tax payments by everyone else from 2001-2004. And those richest 3% now pay nearly as much income taxes as the other 97% combined.” If politicians didn’t spend every penny that comes into Washington, perhaps we could start paying down the debt with our higher tax revenues.

But the media tell us the debt is the tax cuts’ fault. Meanwhile, what aren’t they telling us?

For starters, they’re keeping mum about the ridiculous economic growth since the tax cuts were enacted in 2003. America has added more than 5 million jobs, and the unemployment rate has fallen from 6.3 percent to 4.7 percent. It’s as if they don’t view that as a fact, but as merely a claim on one side of a debate. NBC’s Brian Williams said on May 10, “Republicans say the tax cuts are helping the economy, but Democrats argue most of the benefits go to the wealthiest Americans.” It’s difficult for viewers to get the facts about the U.S. economy from reports like that.

Broadcasters also haven’t been mentioning how upset they were over the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) just a few months ago. A large part of the recent tax bill – $31 billion out of $70 billion – will go to AMT relief for 15 million middle-class families, which has had support from both parties and the media.

Take CBS’s Julie Chen for example. On the February 23 “Early Show,” she was gasping at the impact of the AMT on the middle class. “Oh, my goodness,” Chen said, adding that “it really sounds like they need to change the tax laws.” But when Congress did just that, she said it was a Republican plan and that “Democrats complain the bill favors the rich.”

The media’s suspicion of The Rich is a driving force behind much reporting. But even the Bible doesn’t say money is the root of all evil. It says “the love of money.” That means elevating money above more important things. And as long as the media continue to elevate wealth-bashing above facts, the quality of journalism will suffer.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

Ms. Menefee is deputy editor for the Business & Media Institute.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

Alexander Solzhenitsyn Alexander Solzhenitsyn

That Time The Media Told Solzhenitsyn To Love It Or Leave It.

U.S. POLITICS

Transgender Athletes, Laurel Hubbard, CeCe Telfer, Mary Gregory Transgender Athletes, Laurel Hubbard, CeCe Telfer, Mary Gregory

Transgender Athletes Threaten Women’s Sports.

CULTURE

American Pride is Essential to the American Experiment.

CULTURE

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter