Connect with us
Left-wing advocacy groups harm political process

archive

Interest Groups Poison Judicial Confirmations

Left-wing advocacy groups harm political process

Whatever the outcome of the battle over Judge Sam Alito’s nomination to the Supreme Court, judicial activists are poised to win the larger war. They have shifted the terms and tone of the debate on judicial nominations and are affecting the Senate’s ability to confirm qualified and independent judges.

Activist organizations such as the People For the American Way, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, and the Alliance for Justice orchestrate large campaigns that influence senators to vote down or filibuster judicial nominees. Whether or not their tactics succeed, their very use corrupts the judicial nomination process.

The Senate’s duty is to see that nominees are impartial, professionally qualified, possessed of a judicial temperament, and committed to equal justice under law. The advocacy organizations demand that senators ask ideological questions and require specific answers on issues that might come before nominees as judges. Activist groups draw wild conclusions about candidates based upon their previous case work and clients.

Threatening U.S. senators does little to inspire confidence in the judicial selection process or its results. Pressure the activists exert creates a public impression that the Senate may have something on its mind other than the qualifications of nominees who come before it.

Judicial activist force nominees to debate political ideology, then quickly deny that they have done any such thing. These watchdog groups rely on hyperbole, which demeans the judicial selection process while it draws the Senate into ideological debates. They demand that judicial nominees prove themselves innocent of unfounded charges, claiming that a judicial nominee exhibits “disturbing patterns of thinking” or seems to lack evidence of “compassion” and “sensitivity.”

The activists’ extreme tactics harm the judicial confirmation by politicizing it. Casting judges as political players undermines the appearance of impartiality that is the hallmark of the court system.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

Mr. Scanlon is president of the Capital Research Center. He previously was vice president for corporate relations at The Heritage Foundation and was a Reagan appointee to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

Dunkin Donuts Refuses to Get Woke: ‘We Are Not Starbucks’

CULTURE

‘Reaganesque’: Economist Tells CNBC Trump Could Shift Global Order In China Trade War

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Does ‘Impeach Trump’ Amash Have Financial Interests in China?

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Judge Who Ruled on Trump’s Finances is an Obama Donor.

U.S. POLITICS

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter