Connect with us

archive

Great and Not-So-Great Political Debates

I tuned into the George Galloway – Christopher Hitchens debate on Saturday. Although they spent most of their time simply casting aspersions on each other, you have to admire the skills of the Brits when it comes to engaging in political polemics. In the states, political debate is strictly utilitarian – the only point is to try to convert people to your point of view. But in Britain, they indulge in polemics as a form of art. Even a fringe-dwelling lunatic like Galloway was able to paint these vivid rhetorical pictures of his opponent as a “court jester” in the Bourbon government of the Bushes. In turn, Hitchens accused Galloway of engaging in “sinister piffle” and even ridiculed his own fellow socialists in the audience for bragging of the scars they received in their “long, underground, twilight struggle against Dick Cheney.” It was a refreshing change from the formulaic, talking point clich?? ©s that dominate so much of the political discourse in America.

Then yesterday I watched a debate (available here) on whether or not America is an “empire” between the great Victor David Hanson and the great flake Arianna Huffington. This was ugly. Hanson essentially turned Arianna upside down and used her empty head as a mop to sweep up the floor. He called on his incredibly vast range of knowledge going all the way back to the Athenians to argue why the U.S. cannot rightly be called an empire. Arianna responded with a rambling, unfocused speech that never defined what an empire was. She just threw out the conventional, hackneyed leftwing criticisms of Bush (he engages in “cronyism,” he loves Haliburton, he’s part of a neo-con cabal, he steals candy from babies, etc…) and claimed that everything that he’s doing wrong is a symptom of empire. Most of her speech was nothing more than an admonition of the Democratic Party for not adequately opposing Bush. Hanson came off looking like a philosopher and a historian, while Huffington was reminiscent of a fourth-rate partisan hack. This debate was so unequal that I have to wonder whether some conspiratorial coven of neo-cons deliberately organized it that way.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

Jack Langer, Ph.D., is an editor for Regnery Publishing (a HUMAN EVENTS' sister company) and a freelance journalist. He can be reached at jlanger@eaglepub.com.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

Dunkin Donuts Refuses to Get Woke: ‘We Are Not Starbucks’

CULTURE

Does ‘Impeach Trump’ Amash Have Financial Interests in China?

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Woke Mafia Panics as Game of Thrones Slays Queen SJW

CULTURE

China, the EU, and Globalism – Not Brexit – Killed British Steel

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter