TV cameras are brutally unforgiving — especially during high-stakes election debates. They amplified the angst on Richard Nixon’s brow, the inexperience in Dan Quayle’s eyes, and the vulgarity of Al Gore’s visage.
How will Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry hold up under the spotlight? What will the cameras reveal? Beneath the Christophe-coifed hair, unnaturally taut skin and artificially enhanced tan, there are some naked attributes Kerry cannot conceal:
His spite. His haughtiness. His condescending core.
John Kerry detests his opponents. He detests his own staff. He detests anybody and anything that interferes with his political ambitions. Since returning from Vietnam, his main contribution to public discourse has been contempt, not courage. He possesses resentment, not hope. He does not inspire. He sulks.
Much has been said about Kerry’s superior argumentative skills. He was a champion debater at Yale; his former Republican opponents in Massachusetts have effusively praised his quick recall and rhetorical agility.
This will no doubt impress the like-minded lefties in America’s newsrooms and Hollywood salons. But in America’s living rooms, a man’s unvarnished character — how he carries himself, how he treats others, how he responds to adversity — speaks volumes over the stilted platitudes and smoothly memorized factoids that come out of his mouth.
This isn’t a race for prom king or “Jeopardy!” champion. It’s a race for leader of the free world.
Throughout the course of the campaign, Kerry has demonstrated a holier-than-thou hubris that continues to alienate security moms, Reagan Democrats and swing voters of all backgrounds. It’s not just his disingenuous vacillation on foreign policy (he was for the war before he was against it, but he’d vote the same way) that bothers folks. It’s not just the Kennedy-esque photo-ops of Kerry in athletic settings that scream vanity instead of vigor. It’s the ugly little things that pile up and create the indelible image of a Royal Jerk:
Now, according to Monday’s New York Times: “Senator John Kerry’s campaign said yesterday that Mr. Kerry did not own a Chinese assault rifle, as he was quoted as saying in Outdoor Life magazine, but a single-bolt-action military rifle, blaming aides who filled out the magazine’s questionnaire on his behalf for the error.”
This is the paragon of strong moral leadership who will bring victory in the War on Terrorism and restore America’s values? This Botox-ed egomaniac? This serial waffler? This ruthless buck-passer?
Proverbs 18:12 counsels: “Before destruction the heart of man is haughty, and before honor is humility.” It’s a lesson Mr. Perfect will learn too late.