Connect with us
If Kerry was ashamed of Vietnam in 1971, how is he proud now?

archive

Swift Boat Vets Fighting For Their Country Again

If Kerry was ashamed of Vietnam in 1971, how is he proud now?

Why are the Big Media savaging the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth? Why are the Kerryites telling us to move on and debate the real issues–health care, education, the economy?

Because they know this could kill John Kerry’s candidacy. Because they know this is not just about Vietnam, but also about the credibility and character of the man who would be President.

I have followed Kerry since he became famous. In 1971, I urged Nixon not to enforce Chief Justice Burger’s order to remove Kerry’s Vietnam vets from the Mall. We don’t want another Bonus Army episode, I told the President. Kerry’s vets were allowed to camp out, throw their medals over the fence, and depart.

While I thought Kerry’s testimony to be execrable, I took him to be a man who served bravely. If Unfit For Command by Swift Boat vet and Kerry nemesis John O’Neill is true, Kerry is a dishonest man who slandered his superior officers and betrayed his comrades and country in wartime.

In that April, Kerry told the Senate he had met with 150 vets in Detroit who confessed to having witnessed and committed war crimes with the knowledge of their officers.

Said Kerry, they “had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wire from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam.”

Kerry’s testimony was played back to Paul Galanti, a POW inside Hanoi’s dungeons. Ted Cordier says he and fellow POWS were tortured to force them to tell the kind of lies about U.S. troops in Vietnam John Kerry told the Senate for free.

Kerry has made his service the centerpiece of his career, his convention and his campaign. He cannot evade the questions. If Vietnam was the dirty immoral war he said it was in 1971, how can he now celebrate his service in that war in 2004?

But if Kerry and his Band of Brothers were defending our country, as he now claims, why did he slime as war criminals the comrades he left behind to defend our country?

Kerry told the Fulbright committee “crimes threaten [the country] . . . not reds, but the crimes we are committing.” We are “ashamed of and hated what we were called on to do in Southeast Asia.” But if he was “ashamed of and hated” what he was called on to do in Vietnam by 1971, how could he be proud of it today?

“[T]o attempt to justify the loss of one American life in Vietnam, Cambodia or Laos by linking such loss to the preservation of freedom,” Kerry told Fulbright, “is to us the height of criminal hypocrisy.” But after Saigon fell thousands of South Vietnamese were shot, thousands more sent to “reeducation camps.”

Hundreds of thousands fled in leaky boats into the South China Sea where many were raped by Thai pirates and drowned. A million Cambodians were murdered in 1975 in one of the great holocausts of the 20th century. What does Kerry now think the Vietnam War was about, if not the freedom of these people from the barbarism of Asian Communism?

Kerry’s credibility is now everywhere in question. Biographer Douglas Brinkley says Kerry told him he resigned by letter from the VVAW executive committee, Nov. 10, 1971, and was not at a Kansas City meeting days later, where the assassination of senators was discussed. FBI and pro-Kerry vets now say Kerry did not tell the truth. He was at Kansas City. Kerry’s campaign no longer denies it.

Repeatedly, Kerry has said he was in Cambodia at Christmas 1968. Not one former commander, comrade, or any one of his Band of Brothers support his story. Kerry made it all up to portray himself as a secret suffering warrior risking his life in forbidden land while leaders like Nixon were lying by denying they had sent him there.

Now, it appears that it was John Kerry doing the lying.

In “the sampan incident,” a fog-of-war episode, Kerry’s gunner Steve Gardner shot and killed a man and boy and took a hysterical woman and baby off their bloody boat. The “after-action report” claimed five Viet Cong dead and two captured. Who wrote it?

Four of Kerry’s five medals are now under question either for falsehoods or exaggerations. The more information that comes out, the less believable Kerry becomes. O’Neill’s Swift Boat vets may be a little older, they may be a little grayer, but they still know how to fight for their country.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Up Next:

Phoning It In:

Don't Miss:

Aborted Ban:

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

Feminism: False Advertising at its Finest.

CULTURE

Global Elites Started The Russia Nonsense.

U.S. POLITICS

Kassam Banned From Facebook on UK Election Day.

TECH

Trump Puts British Intel Under Spotlight: ‘I Hope [Barr] Looks at the UK… I May Talk to PM…’

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter