In an emerging scandal, NBC News has produced tapes proving beyond deniability that the new deputy undersecretary of Defense for intelligence is . . . a Christian. Lt. Gen. William G. (Jerry) Boykin has been captured on a series of grainy tapes, attesting to his faith at churches and prayer breakfasts. Having driven the Judeo-Christian value system out of the public square, the classrooms and the Alabama Supreme Court, liberals now want to drive it out of church.
In one “inflammatory” remark, Boykin said that the enemy was not Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein, but “is a spiritual enemy. He’s called the principality of darkness. The enemy is a guy called Satan.”
Islamic leaders in the United States instantly denounced Boykin’s unflattering characterization of bin Laden and Hussein as an attack on Islam. They haven’t been this huffy since describing bin Laden as “not a true Muslim” and Hussein as a “secularist.” If our enemies aren’t “true Muslims,” why are the “true Muslims” always so offended on their behalf?
James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute, has called for Boykin to be fired. After the 9/11 attacks, Zogby said: “Regardless of who is ultimately found to be responsible for these terrorist murders, no ethnic or religious community should be treated as suspect and collectively blamed.” But apparently they are collectively offended. They might want to think through the implications of that. If we have to apologize for the general, then maybe they should apologize for 9/11.
Zogby made the curious argument that Boykin is “unfit for the position” because he has “become a weapon our enemies will use against us.” On Fox News’ “Hannity and Colmes,” a Clinton Administration official made the same inane point, saying Boykin’s remarks “could be used as a recruitment video for Osama bin Laden.” I love the idea of moderate Arabs carefully poring over American newspapers before deciding whether or not to join al-Qaeda.
In fact, an Arab-American was quoted in The Boston Globe saying Boykin’s remarks “made most people in our community think the Bush Administration is racist.” That’s interesting. The deputy undersecretary of Defense calls Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein evil, and all those patriotic Arabs we keep hearing about are lost to Bush forever! Osama supporters are now moving decisively to the Dean camp.
In another talk, Gen. Boykin recalled seeing a Somalian warlord on TV laughing at Americans and saying they would never capture him because his God, Allah, would protect him. Boykin said: “Well, you know what? I knew that my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a real God, and his was an idol.”
A reporter for the Los Angeles Times claimed that Boykin referred to the God of Islam as “an idol.” The reporter, of course, was committing a hate crime by assuming that Fascist warlords trying to kill Americans are practicing “true Islam.” As we have repeatedly been assured, they are not. Apparently, what Boykin should have said is: “Well, you know what? I knew that his remark was a violation of separation of church and state!”
In any event, I guess we’ve come a long way from calling our enemies “Nips” and “Krauts.” Now we can’t even say they’re idolaters. When referring to people trying to kill Americans, how about we pull only from the list of names liberals use every day of the week for George Bush, Dick Cheney, John Ashcroft and Gen. Boykin?
Boykin also said the terrorists are “after us because we’re a Christian nation.” This is just silly. As Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad recently indicated in his speech before the Islamic Summit Conference, they are after us because we are a Jewish nation.
Last week Democratic presidential candidates speaking to an Arab-American conference were tripping over one another for the Osama-is-not-Satan vote by demanding Boykin’s resignation. These characters are terrific at figuring how to fire anyone in the Bush Administration except Norman Mineta. How about we trade in Mineta for the 20-year-old kid who managed to place boxcutters, bleach and molding clay on four airplanes? If only he had put them in his shoes! Then Norman Mineta would have caught him.
Sen. Kerry said Boykin’s remarks were “un-American.” The only people you can’t call un-American are the ones burning the American flag or demanding an apology from a man who called Osama bin Laden Satanic.
Howard Dean said the American flag “does not belong to Gen. Boykin,” it belongs to all Americans. Could someone rustle up a liberal who actually owns a flag?
In the most pathetic case of pandering in recorded history, Sen. Joe Lieberman called for Boykin’s resignation before the group, but still got booed. Lieberman said, “the war on terror is a war on terrorists, not religion.” Who is Lieberman standing up for here? Is he upset because Boykin compared the terrorists to Satan or Satan to the terrorists?
Boykin is a highly decorated officer who has participated in nearly every major military operation for the past 25 years-from Jimmy Carter’s failed attempt to rescue hostages in Iran, to Reagan’s successful invasion of Grenada, to Clinton’s disastrous “Black Hawk Down” episode in Somalia. (Say, anyone notice a pattern? ) No one has questioned the general’s job qualifications. Liberals want him fired because he spoke in a church. If Gen. Boykin had been caught giving talks to NAMBLA instead of church groups, Democrats would be hailing him as a patriot for exercising his 1st Amendment rights.
Rep. John Conyers, (D-Mich.) demanded that Boykin be reprimanded or reassigned, saying his views were “extreme,” “closed-minded” and “zealous.” We should be more open-minded toward people trying to kill us.
The Rev. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance, said Boykin’s remarks “fly in the face of the pleas of the President and violate the basic principles of tolerance and inclusion that are implicit in the culture of this nation.” Uh-oh. If liberals don’t like what Boykin said about the terrorists, wait until they find out about the MOAB bombs the U.S. military has been dropping on them.