Connect with us
GOP Senators successfully blocked an attempt to triple this year's increase in funding for the Head Start program.

archive

Roll Call: Senate Blocks Boost For Head Start

GOP Senators successfully blocked an attempt to triple this year’s increase in funding for the Head Start program.

On September 9, by a vote of 47 to 47, the Senate refused to waive the Budget Act and consider an amendment to the Health and Human Services appropriations bill that would increase Head Start spending. The motion required 60 votes to allow for further consideration of the amendment.

“This amendment increases the Head Start appropriation by $350 million above the increase recommended by the Appropriations Committee for the coming fiscal year,” said Sen. Chris Dodd (D.-Conn.), the amendment’s sponsor. Had the amendment passed, the total spending increase would have been $500 billion.

“Very briefly, what this means, in the absence of this amendment being adopted, we will have to cut the number of children who are presently in Head Start programs,” said Dodd. “With the adoption of this amendment of $350 million, we can increase the enrollment by 36,000 children in Head Start programs across the country.”

Liberal Sen. Arlen Specter (R.-Pa.) opposed Dodd’s amendment, but only reluctantly. “I just wish we had the funds available now to add the $350 million requested by the Senator from Connecticut,” said Specter. “For next year, we have funded an increase in Head Start for almost $150 million. Regrettably, we are stretched very thin with respect to the budget we have here, on the budget resolution and on the allocation to this subcommittee.”

“You can’t squeeze blood out of a turnip and this bill has turned into a turnip,” said Specter.

A “yes” vote was a vote to waive the Budget Act and allow an up-or-down vote on increasing Head Start spending. It was, in effect, a vote for the spending hike. A “no” vote was a vote against the motion, and was, in effect, a vote to kill the amendment and a vote against the spending increase.

FOR THE MOTION: 47 AGAINST THE MOTION: 47
REPUBLICANS FOR (3):
Campbell
Collins
Hutchison

DEMOCRATS FOR (43):
Akaka
Baucus
Bayh
Biden
Bingaman
Boxer
Breaux
Byrd
Cantwell
Carper
Clinton
Conrad
Corzine
Daschle
Dayton
Dodd
Dorgan
Durbin
Feingold
Feinstein
Harkin
Hollings
Inouye
Johnson
Kennedy
Kohl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Levin
Lincoln
Mikulski
Murray
Nelson (Fla.)
Nelson (Neb.)
Pryor
Reed (R.I.)
Reid (Nev.)
Rockefeller
Sarbanes
Schumer
Stabenow
Wyden

INDEPENDENT FOR (1):
Jeffords

REPUBLICANS AGAINST (46):
Alexander
Allard
Allen
Bennett
Bond
Brownback
Bunning
Burns
Chafee
Chambliss
Cochran
Coleman
Cornyn
Craig
Crapo
DeWine
Dole
Ensign
Enzi
Fitzgerald
Frist
Graham (S.C.)
Grassley
Gregg
Hagel
Hatch
Inhofe
Kyl
Lott
Lugar
McCain
McConnell
Murkowski
Nickles
Roberts
Santorum
Sessions
Shelby
Snowe
Specter
Stevens
Sununu
Talent
Thomas
Voinovich
Warner

DEMOCRATS AGAINST (1):
Miller

NOT VOTING: 6

REPUBLICANS (2): DEMOCRATS (4):
Domenici
Smith
Edwards
Graham (Fla.)
Kerry
Lieberman
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

The Divided State of Britain.

CULTURE

Big Tech Big Tech

‘Principled’ Rightists Have Forgotten What the Principles Are.

TECH

‘Squash Amash’ Rally Takes Aim at Michigan’s Anti-Trump GOP Rep

U.S. POLITICS

Gulf of Oman 'attack': Oil tankers on fire amid rising tensions between Iran and rivals Gulf of Oman 'attack': Oil tankers on fire amid rising tensions between Iran and rivals

Don’t Rush to War with Iran Over Some Tankers.

U.S. POLITICS

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter