Connect with us
American students are not learning history. One of the obivious reasons is poor teaching. But a more insidious reason is the censorship of historic events that is practiced by many textbook publishers.

archive

Teaching History: Fact Or Fiction?

American students are not learning history. One of the obivious reasons is poor teaching. But a more insidious reason is the censorship of historic events that is practiced by many textbook publishers.

In rare moments when Congress isn’t preoccupied with the war, taxes or prescription drugs, Congress is worrying that American students don’t know any American history. Congress is right to worry because this is true, but it doesn’t follow that the federal government is capable of remedying the problem.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as the Nation’s Report Card, reported that less than half of high school seniors demonstrate even a basic grasp of history.

The American Council of Trustees and Alumni, in a report called Losing America’s Memory: Historical Illiteracy in the 21st Century, charged that 55 colleges and universities, including the most prestigious, have no American history requirement and only a fifth of colleges require any course in history at all.

On the other hand, some colleges do require courses in “non-Eurocentric culture or society,” and that requirement can be filled by courses in human development, sociology, theater, dance or film. Social science requirements can be met by courses in women’s studies.

In 1994, the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) gave funds, generously provided by the taxpayers, to professors at the University of California Los Angeles to produce a volume prescribing what U.S. public school students ought to be taught about their country.

When the 271-page book was published, called National Standards for United States History, it was shot through with Multiculturalism, anti-Western bias, and the Politically Correct nonsense that all ethnic and gender groups are victims of white male oppression.

Standards was such an embarrassment that the U.S. Senate denounced it in a vote of 99 to 1, with even Ted Kennedy voting against it.

Longtime American Federation of Teachers CEO Al Shanker said it was the first time a government ever tried to teach children to “feel negative about their own country.”

After the public flap, the authors made some cosmetic changes in Standards. But thousands of copies of the original book were already in use by schools and textbook publishers.

Congress should have learned that if we give taxpayers’ money to the current crop of history professors, they will rewrite history to serve liberal dogmas.

The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) includes a Civic Education program funded at $28.8 million for FY 2003 to teach the history of the Constitution. In addition to $10 million already provided for history in the NEH budget for next year, legislation is pending to provide another $25 million to NEH to set up state-run workshops to teach teachers of American history.

The easiest way to check out the biases of a history textbook is to look at its treatment of Sen. Joseph McCarthy. Standards, for example, which didn’t include a single word about Paul Revere, Thomas Edison, the Wright brothers, Albert Einstein, or Gen. Douglas MacArthur, inflicted 19 unfavorable mentions on McCarthy. Almost everything the current generation “knows” about McCarthy is false.

Students and adults who want to learn the history that has been censored out of their textbooks should read Ann Coulter’s current bestseller, Treason. Her book does an awesome job of describing the widespread infiltration of the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman Administrations by a vast network of Soviet spies and agents.

The official release in 1995 of the Venona Papers proves there is no longer any doubt about the massive penetration of important positions by men who served the interests of the Soviet Union.

Coulter shows there is no longer any doubt about the willful, partisan coverup of this treason by the Democrats whose strategy was to target “McCarthyism” as the enemy and thereby deflect blame from FDR, who called Stalin “Uncle Joe,” Harry Truman who said “I like old Joe; Joe’s a decent fellow,” and Vice President Henry Wallace who was a blatant Soviet apologist.

The second way to check out the biases of social studies textbooks is to look at their treatment of Ronald Reagan. The liberal line is to accuse him of dangerous warmongering for challenging Soviet power with an anti-missile defense and rhetoric such as the “evil empire.”

Pulitzer-prize winning historian David McCullough told a Senate committee that “we are raising a generation of people who are historically illiterate.” Ann Coulter’s book is a must-read because it’s a necessary antidote to that illiteracy.

Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter

Written By

Phyllis Schlafly is a lawyer, conservative political analyst and the author of the newly revised and expanded Supremacists: The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop It.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW:

‘Men in Burkas’ Acid Attack Londoners

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Tucker Carlson targeted by Antifa All Out DC Tucker Carlson targeted by Antifa All Out DC

AntiFa Targets Tucker Carlson’s Home In D.C. Poster Campaign.

U.S. POLITICS

Kavanaugh 2.0? Trump’s Rape Accuser E. Jean Carroll Should Face Tougher Questions.

CULTURE

Google Anti-Conservative Political Bias Google Anti-Conservative Political Bias

Google Admits It Wants to ‘Prevent The Next Trump Situation’

TECH

Connect
Newsletter Signup.

Sign up to the Human Events newsletter