Guns & Patriots

The Muslim Brotherhood in America: Part I: Understanding the Threat

It is now March of 2011.  That jihadi attack on the United States is over nine years behind us.  The declaration of a global jihad from Iran in 1979 is over 30 years in our rear view mirror.  The national security apparatus of the United States has spent hundreds of billions of dollars to “make America safer,” yet we still have not defined our enemy – or even tried.  There is no place in the national security structure which has objectively evaluated the threat doctrine of our enemy, and then created a strategic plan for victory for the United States – per U.S. warfighting doctrine.  This lack of strategic understanding of the nature of the threat we face is not only costing us lives on the battlefield in wars with no realistically stated objectives, but so long as we drift aimlessly, we cannot win and we allow the enemy to move our boat as he sees fit.  That, is the enemy’s strategy.  And he is executing with great success.

Does anyone wonder how it is the U.S. military is crushing the enemy on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan (and elsewhere)  daily, yet not winning the strategic war?

The United States continues to view the wars (the establishment sees this as several conflicts, not as one global conflict) as kinetic engagements where guns, air power, drones, bombs, and other weapon of war are brought to bear on “Al Qaeda terrorists” and others with whom we are engaged on the many battlefields around the world.  At the FBI, the focus is on preventing the next attack.  While this is important, “attacks” are not the main focus of effort for this enemy.  Local and State Police are also focused on preventing attacks, the physical security of office buildings, critical infrastructure, and the safety of important public figures.  When the subject of an investigation is found NOT to be involved in a plot to cause “violence” that case is closed and the investigator goes on to the next one in the stack.  This is where we are losing the war.  While preventing a school bus bombing or  the take-over of a bank by Jihadis should be taken seriously by our law enforcement officers, from the enemy’s perspective, these are tactical engagements, not strategic.

Every brand new intelligence officer in the United States military knows that when the United States evaluates a threat, our doctrine drives us to begin our process with WHO the enemy says he is and with WHAT the enemy says are HIS reasons for acting.  That is where the U.S. analytical process begins – per our own doctrine.  If we had done this after 9/11, we would not have so much confusion about the enemy we are engaging.
One hundred percent of the enemy we are fighting states he is fighting “Jihad” in the “Cause of Allah” in order to implement Islamic Law (Shariah).  Therefore, U.S. analysts must begin here.  Does Islamic Law exist?  If so, what does it say about “Jihad” and the requirements for Jihad?  In fact, authoritative Islamic Law does exist.  There are not “a thousand interpretations” as the Muslim Brotherhood advisors tell our leadership.  Islamic Law does define “Jihad” and the requirements for Jihad.  Islamic Law as defined by those using it to kill us and overthrow our government necessarily becomes the “Stated Enemy Threat Doctrine.”   As a 4-star general told me a few months ago when I asked him what he thought about the fact that when Al Qaeda quotes Islamic Law they are always accurately quoting Islamic Law:  “Well, if that’s true, it completely changes the nature of the way we are fighting this war.”  Exactly.

Our entire national security apparatus is focused (fixed) on the threat of the violent Jihadis – Al Qaeda and the hundreds of other jihadi groups throughout the world engaging U.S and allied troops on the ground around the world.

Our enemy has no intention of defeating us on the battlefield.  The kinetic war being waged by organizations like Al Qaeda, Hamas, and the many other jihadi groups is meant to bleed us, fix us in place, and create a strategic distraction while the real war they are fighting is won in the information battlespace.  While AQ fixes us in place, the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) presses the U.S. – and the West at large – into a corner with a stated foreign policy mirroring that of Al Qaeda.  Who is the OIC?  The OIC is the umbrella organization for every Muslim nation in the world – 57 states (they count Palestine as a state).  At the Head of State and King level the OIC seeks to re-establish the global Islamic State (Caliphate) and implement Islamic Law.  They have a 10-Year Plan in English on their website that may begin shedding light on who they are and what they intend for the West.  In 1993, the OIC served an official treaty to the United Nations called the “Cairo Declaration” stating the OIC defines “Human Rights” as Shariah (Islamic Law) – this is significantly different from the International Declaration of Human Rights.  In fact, the reason the International Muslim Brotherhood is calling for the death of Qaddafi is because he is “killing Muslims without right,” a capital crime under Islamic Law, and an act defined as “terrorism” by the OIC – that means the Head of State and King of every Muslim nation in the world has a parallel foreign policy from the one they are discussing with our State Department, and our State Department does not have clue one about it.

The International Muslim Brotherhood, the “vanguard” of the global Islamic Movement, is the leading edge of the enemy’s assault on the United States and the West.  The Muslim Brotherhood, like the OIC and Al Qaeda, seeks to re-establish the global Islamic State (Caliphate) and implement Islamic Law (Shariah).  You do not need a SCIF or a “secure space” to pull this information up on a classified government system.  All of the enemy doctrine can be found on the worldwide web, in books, in speeches, in their training curricula, and coming out of their mouths on a daily basis.  We just need to listen.  The Muslim Brotherhood’s creed includes the the phrase “…Jihad is our Way, and martyrdom in the way of Allah is our highest aspiration.”  The MB assassinated the Egyptian Prime Minister in 1948, and the Egyptian security service killed MB founder Hassan al Banna on the streets of Cairo in 1949.  Violence is inherent to MB operations, manifested in the “Special Section.”  The “Special work” of the MB is “Military work” – violence and warfare.  Hamas was created out of the Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood as the result of international MB meetings.  Hamas is a designated terrorist organization.  Recordings obtained by the FBI of MB meetings in the U.S. reveal they have had weapons training camps here as early as the mid-1980’s.  When the MB says they have “renounced violence” they are – hold onto your hats – lying.

From several major terrorism trials in the United States, and other information, we now know nearly every major Muslim organization in North America is controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) or a derivative group.  We know many are support entities for Hamas, and all of the Islamic organizations working with the U.S. government are controlled by the MB.  These include:  the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a Hamas support entity; the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Hamas organization; the Muslim Students Associations (MSA); the Muslim American Society (MAS); the Interntional Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT); the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA); the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC); the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), a Hamas support entity; and many other.  We also know that the objectives of the MB mirror those of  Al Qaeda.

The MB’s doctrine is crystal clear on their objectives.  The means for achieving these objectives is to wage a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” – a “grand jihad” – to destroy us from within.  They seek to co-opt our leadership in all areas of our society – political, military, intelligence/law enforcement, media, religious.  Civilization jihad by our hands.  When we see that the Islamic advisor to President Clinton was a Muslim Brother and an Al Qaeda operative currently in federal prison, or that the MB runs the Shariah Compliant Financial programs for the U.S. Department of the Treasury, or that senior policy advisors to Secretary Napolitano are Muslim Brothers, or that the Assistant Director for the FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate is an Iranian-born

Muslim, we see that there are catastrophic security issues within the U.S. government and that – just maybe – the MB means what they say.

During this series, we will go into painful detail to identify and describe the primary Muslim Brotherhood organizations in the United States, especially those working with U.S. law enforcement, intelligence, and national security organizations.  We will also detail some of the individual within the U.S. system who are aiding and abetting the Muslim Brotherhood, or at least unwittingly assisting them.  The utter and complete catastrophic failure of the very agencies charged with protecting us will be detailed over the next several weeks.  If facts are upsetting to you, please don’t read.

Sign Up
  • Guest

    you right we could go back and forth however for simple disrespect that you won’t even address my name correctly let me know what type of person you are. I was bored and I’ve found this even more boring. I have better things to do with my time and my life than to defend what I do or why I do what I do to someone whom at the end of the day…..don’t even matter..holla!

  • Tyler

    Dear Sir or Madam,

    First off, since you claim to be a “true” Christian, would you please point out to me the Scripture passages in the Bible in which God gives explicit instructions to Christians to kill their enemies? Obviously, these references would NOT include any of the Old Testament passages in which God ordered the Hebrew nation of Israel to destroy a SPECIFIC people group or enemy nation, since you are claiming to be a Christian, not a Jew.

    Secondly, I know that you don’t mean that the Bible says Christians should kill Muslims specifically, since the founder of Islam, Muhammad, wasn’t born until about 570 A.D., over 450 years AFTER the last book of the Bible, Revelation, was written (between 60 and 95 A.D.).

    Finally, I wish to compliment you on your prose. For someone whose spelling identifies them as some sort of hillbilly pirate, your capitalization is practically perfect, and your use of proper punctuation actually exceeds that of many high school students. Well done!

  • farnerfan

    Impeachment, sniper, .223, .50, and ATTACK!!!

    All muslims, memorize these words/terms.

    Want to come to my house and play, oh sorry, pray?

  • farnerfan

    Very Well Said, RWIce.

    These muslims are such dweebs!! They really think they can conquer THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA!! We’re not Egypt…they will find us more formidable! They just chose the wrong country…they’ll realize this soon enough. When they start disappearing, that is! lol lol hahaha! All these comments just make me wanna clean my guns.

  • Greg Vermeychuk

    Archie, you seem to know quite a bit about Islam, Islamic texts, etc. Have you lived in an Islamic country? I myself spent much time in the Middle East. By and large, the real problem is the lack of education. When you have an educated person, who has worked hard and has a lot to lose, you don’t have a religious fundamentalist who is prone to terrorism as a solution to his problems. I recognize the fact that our “home-grown” Islamic terrorists are “educated,” but I draw the distinction between “educated” and “accomplished.” This new breed is a bunch of dilettantes, like Abbie Hoffman and Patty Hearst. Their ideas have been formed in the faculty lounge or while smoking dope, rather than in the crucible of the world of commerce and conflict..
    It is incumbent upon us, people who know what we are talking about, to make sure that our fellow citizens understand the true nature of things. Thanks for your support.

  • KillferCrist

    Rite on thar, Desert!!! You knows how to smak that nail rite on the head. Jest like you I knowd that rag head crowd be evul. They be tryen to dispose Sharon Law on Amerika, jest like you say. An I be agreein that live and let live dont werk no mores. Ya gotta strik firstus, jest like Precident Bushes done when he foun out bout them wepons of mad destruckshun that Saddam had. Bushes send in the troups an gues what?? We gets rid of Saddam an them wepons of mad destruckshun both. A two-fer. Dont be gitten no bettern nat. An iffen you read the Good Book, you knowd the Big Guy upstars be real happy with that. You jest knowed the Big Guy wanted that evul one outta there. We was happy to do the jobs. An we also be on the same boat cause a that rag head invason you be spoutin offs about. We both knows theys tryen to take over Amerika. Import Sharons Law. Rag heads be are enemy for shure. Gotta stop em. You needs talk with LA Perrier over at the NRA. He gots him 1 millon mens udder arms, ready to take on Osama an all his flunkies at the Whites House and then the rag heads. Im gitten my Gluck oiled up and ready to joins the fight. Whats bout you? I be bettin you be all trash talk an no actshun. Probly a commie. It take a real mans to carry a gun. I aint shure you culd make it into that company.

  • Archibald Angel

    Hi, Greg: I spent a number of years living in an Islamic country in the Middle East. While I appreciate your points, I have to disagree with you about the impact of education on the jihadist propensity of any individual muslim.

    Many people we Westerners would describe as “terrorists” are concomitantly considered pious by their fellow muslims. Moreover, they count many highly educated people among their ranks — physicians, scientists, engineers — a large number of whom have doctoral degrees in their respective disciplines. By way of example, the failed bombings in UK a couple of years ago were planned and nearly executed by eight muslims, six (6) of whom were medical doctors.

    Perhaps the most prominent example where religion trumps education is exemplified in Al Qaeda’s number two man, Ayman Zawahiri. He was similarly trained as a medical doctor; and he came from a very wealthy and influential family. As wealthy and educated as they were however, the Zawahiri family’s reputation was primarily religious and, for a majority of the Ummah, it is such ties that truly matter. Zawahiri’s uncle was the rector of Cairo’s al Azhar University, the center of Islamic thought in the Sunni world. As you probably know, Al Azhar is roughly the muslim equivalent of the Vatican for scriptural (canon and liturgy) teachings. Zawahiri was a committed Islamist from the time he was a young boy growing up in an affluent Egyptian home to the time he joined Usama Bin Laden in the establishment of Al Qaeda. His commitment to the principles articulated by Sayyid Qutb remained undisturbed by any training he received in Western medicine.

    The others who we Westerners perceive as “terrorists” are not dissimilar. We have to be very careful about attributing Western motives to jihadist actions; slaughter of the infidels is not the result of grievances such as historic European colonialism or economic inequities, regardless of what CNN’s committed Marxists assert. Instead, it emerges from a genuine commitment to walk in the path of Mohamad and fulfill his commands.

    Just my thoughts. But I sure do agree with what you observed about Abby Hoffman, Patty Hearst and the rest of them (let’s not forget Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn!).

  • hicusdicus


  • hicusdicus


  • hicusdicus

    Will any of this stuff I just read help me clear a virus out of my computer. If not just what will it help me achieve? Why are you telling me all this useless information.I need to know where I can get an abortion and sign up for welfare and food stamps and get my parking ticket validated all at the same time. It would help if there was a tavern next door.

  • hicusdicus

    In the hospital the relatives gathered in the waiting room, where a

    family member lay gravely ill. Finally, the doctor came in looking tired and somber.
    “I’m afraid I’m the bearer of bad news,” he said as he surveyed the worried faces. “The only hope left for your loved one at this time is a brain transplant. It’s an experimental procedure, very risky, but it is the only hope. Insurance will cover the procedure, but you will have to
    pay for the BRAIN.”

    The family members sat silent as they absorbed the news. After a time, someone asked, “How much will a brain cost?”

    The doctor quickly responded, “$5,000 for a Democrat’s brain; $200 for a Republican’s brain.”

    The moment turned awkward. Some of the Democrats actually had to ‘try’ not to smile, avoiding eye contact with the Republicans. A man unable to control his curiosity finally blurted out the question everyone wanted
    to ask, “Why is the Democrat’s brain so much more than a Republican’s brain?”

    The doctor smiled at the childish innocence and explained to the entire group, “It’s just standard pricing procedure. We have to price Republicans’ brains a lot lower because they’ve been used.” No body could afford the brains on this forum.


  • Guest

    For all those who originally hit “Like” on the first two comments and want to take them back, just hit “Like” again and it will be done.

    Thanks, DisqUS.

  • Guest

    Our “Guest” appears to be a Black Muslim.

    This explains the double-minded part.

  • Guest

    Yep, our Guest is a Black Muslim…

    As for only women being raped in this country, this is disregarding the role of the man in a California divorce.

  • Guest

    Notice how our “guest” capitalizes Quran but not the word Bible? And she ain’t got no smarts as far as proper use of English is concerned.

    One more time, she’s a Black Muslim. This explains it all.

  • arcing

    Now, now, NoCrud, you really should consider the feelings of nerds when you compare an idiot like KFC to them. I know many nerds and they are usually decent people. Many of them own guns and are patriotic. Now calling him/her/it the south end of a northbound horse might be more like it.

  • arcing

    I have lived in a Muslim country and what you say is true, ox.

  • jamespeed

    all muslims, whether born in usa or not should be deported immediately and search for those who hide their idenithy as muslim and do same. jamespeed

  • jamespeed

    this was the land of the free to do no harm to anyone else or their property; that is until the muslims and their political correctness practices emerged,

  • jamespeed

    muslims have infiltrated the u.s. for one reason only….to take what you have, and we are allowing this to take place like lemmings.

  • TopAssistant

    Who said this, to whom, when, why and what have we ever done about it? Would you consider this statement to be contrary to our Constitution, our way of life, a danger to our National/Homeland Security and the preservation of our Constitution? Would you think these are words of an enemy? Surely, both the House and Senate studied this but where are the reports?
    “The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every musselman [muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
    This statement was a part of a March 28, 1786, letter from John Adams and Thomas Jefferson to John Jay, the United States Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Continental Congress, concerning their conversation with Tripoli’s to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman as to why his pirates/terrorists hijacked our merchant ships, stole the ships and cargo while holding the sailors for ransom. (Source: Founders Archives

    Why are we failing to mention the obvious issues in the 1786 letter that still exists today? Here are the main points in 1786; are they the same today with the Muslim Brotherhood in America and their plan they wrote to destroy us?

    First they say “it was founded on the Laws of their prophet”; Next, “that it was written in their Koran”; “that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners”; “that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and”; “to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and”; “that every musselman [muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

    In 2004, the FBI found the Muslim Brotherhood in America’s plan in the sub-basement of Ismail Elbarasse’s home. Here is a quote from their plan: “The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

    The Muslim Brotherhood’s credo is the same in all 100 nations in which they claim to reside, including the United States of America; it has been the same since they first formed in Egypt in 1928: “Allah is our objective; the Quran is our law, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and dying in the way of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.” On December 25, 2013 Egypt declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization while the Obama, Bush and Clinton administrations actively recruited them and have them establishing our policy by funding our destruction and sending our military around the globe fighting and dying installing Shariah/Islamic law, fighting civil wars for Islamic countries and completely ignoring what Muslims say about Islam. We allow them to purge the training materials from our military, FBI, DHS, and DOJ training materials.

    This is the writings of an enemy to those believing in freedom? Their goal has been from the beginning to form a global Caliphate ruled by Shariah/Islamic law?
    Here is a statement that sums it all up: “Why has the U.S. government called certain Islamic groups supporters of terror in federal court, and then turned around and called these same organizations “moderates” and embraced them as outreach partners? In a number of cases from the Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations, the leaders of these organizations (some of whom are now in federal prison) were under active investigation at the same time they were meeting with senior U.S. leaders at the White House and the Capitol and helping develop U.S. policy. Now these same Islamic organizations and leaders have openly encouraged a purge of
    counterterrorism training that have effectively blinded law enforcement,
    homeland security, and intelligence agencies to active terror threats as seen
    in the inaction of the FBI concerning the Boston bombing suspects and other
    terror cases. This study poses serious questions as to the efficacy and even
    security concerns about U.S. government outreach to Islamic groups, which often turn out to be Islamist militants, enemies of Islamic moderation, and even supporters of terrorism.” (BLIND TO TERROR: THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S DISASTROUS MUSLIM OUTREACH EFFORTS AND THE IMPACT ON U.S. MIDDLE EAST POLICY BY PATRICK S. POOLE JUNE 4, 2013)