Chevy Saves The Planet
General Motors has apparently had an epiphany. GM now “realizes” that it “shares the planet with everyone” and wants “to do more to help keep it clean.” So GM has pledged to buy carbon offsets representing one year’s worth of greenhouse gas emissions from the 1.9 million Chevys projected to be sold during 2011.
Under the Chevy Carbon Reduction program, GM will spend up to $40 million over five years offsetting about 8 million metric tons of carbon dioxide.
There is much less here than meets the eye.
First, while GM describes the program’s cost as “substantial,’ it’s really not. GM expects to sell about 10 million Chevys over the next five years — so the actual expenditure works out to about $4 per car. That triviality will be matched by the program’s
Human activities emit about 40 billion tons of greenhouse gases annually. So if all goes as planned, GM’s program will reduce global human greenhouse gas emissions by about 0.004 percent over the five years. GM calls this “a start” and denies that the program is “greenwashing.”
GM states on its web site that, “This is really about making a positive statement to our customers. And letting them know that we are committed to doing the right thing.”
But merely claiming green-ness while accomplishing nothing tangible for the environment would seem to fit the definition of greenwashing to a tee — “the deceptive use of green PR or green marketing in order to promote a misleading perception that a company’s policies or products are environmentally friendly,” according to Wikipedia.
And it’s quite possible that the Chevy Carbon Reduction program will accomplish even less than calculated above since it involves the purchase of so-called “carbon offsets.”
GM’s $4-per-Chevy expense will be directed to the Bonneville Environmental Foundation, an Oregon-based non-profit that will “invest” the money in purportedly climate-friendly projects like planting trees, and solar and wind power.
But carbon offsets can be murky endeavors — so much so than when the Government Accounting Office reported on them in 2008, concerns about their legitimacy overflowed into the report’s title, “Carbon Offsets: The U.S. Voluntary Market Is Growing, but Quality Assurance Poses Challenges for Market Participants.”
The basic problem with offsets is that buyers can be ripped-off pretty easily. Offset sellers claim the proceeds go toward efforts to prevent the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. But as greenhouse gas emissions are invisible, challenging to estimate, and the accounting for these projects is typically not open to public scrutiny, buyers must rely on the credibility of the brokers and project operators. The GAO found that “the information provided to consumers by retailers offered limited assurance of credibility.” In other words, buyer beware.
Aside from any schemes and scams run by individual offset brokers and project operators, there is the overlay of the radical environmental agenda on the offset industry.
GM’s offset broker, the Bonneville Environmental Foundation (BEF), is run by a former employee of the radical Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). BEF’s offsets are “certified” by an organization called Green-e, the board of directors of which includes members of NRDC and the radical Union of Concerned Scientists — as well as BEF’s senior vice president.
So not only are BEF and Green-e not independent of one another at the management level, they are threaded together ideologic ally by ties to radical environmentalism, a movement whose members will say and do almost anything to advance their social and political agenda.
And GM is going to rely on assurances from BEF and Green-e about offsetting invisible greenhouse gas emissions?
Should any of this matter to consumers? Who cares whether GM scams and gets scammed for a few dollars per car?
Bailouts aside, taxpayers and consumers should already be angry with the Big Three. Chrysler, Ford and GM are all members of the NRDC-run U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a big business-radical environmentalist coalition that lobbied cap-and-trade. If the Big Three and their green buddies had succeeded in foisting cap-and-trade upon us during the 111th Congress, millions of U.S. jobs and trillions of dollars in GDP would have vanished during the ensuing years.
What separates Chrysler and Ford from GM presently is that, cutting through all the nonsense, the Chevy Carbon Reduction program is little more than a $40 million wealth transfer from consumers via GM to anti-consumer radical environmentalists and their allies.
The good news for GM is that when I get a new car in 2011, no one will need to worry about any emissions from a Chevy.